<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605509719</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100642.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10877-014-9578-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10877-014-9578-2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The effect of endotracheal tube cuff pressure change during gynecological laparoscopic surgery on postoperative sore throat: a control study</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Guiqi Geng, Jingyi Hu, Shaoqiang Huang]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Postoperative respiratory complications related to endotracheal intubation usually present as cough, sore throat, hoarseness. The aim of the study was to examine the effects of endotracheal tube cuff pressure changes during gynecological laparoscopic surgery on postoperative sore throat rates. Thirty patients who underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery and 30 patients who underwent laparotomy under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were included. After induction of general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation, the cuff was inflated to 25mmHg. At 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60min after endotracheal intubation, cuff pressure and peak airway pressure were recorded. At 2 and 24h after surgery, the patients were assessed for complaints of a sore throat. In patients who underwent laparotomy, cuff pressure and peak airway pressure did not change significantly at different time points after intubation. In patients who received laparoscopic surgery, cuff pressure and peak airway pressure were significantly increased compared to initial pressure at all examined time points. In both groups, the endotracheal tube cuff pressure and peak airway pressure were significantly correlated (R=0.9431, P&lt;0.01; R=0.8468, P&lt;0.01). Compared to patients who had undergone laparotomy, patients who had undergone laparoscopic surgery showed significantly higher sore throat scores at both 2 and 24h after surgery (P&lt;0.01). Pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position may increase airway pressure and cuff pressure, resulting in increased incidence of postoperative sore throat.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Airway pressure</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Cuff pressure</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Sore throat</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Endotracheal intubation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Geng</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Guiqi</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Anesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shenyang Road 128#, Yangpu District, 200090, Shanghai, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Hu</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jingyi</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Anesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shenyang Road 128#, Yangpu District, 200090, Shanghai, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Huang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Shaoqiang</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Anesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shenyang Road 128#, Yangpu District, 200090, Shanghai, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">29/1(2015-02-01), 141-144</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1387-1307</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">29:1&lt;141</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">29</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10877</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9578-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9578-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Geng</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Guiqi</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Anesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shenyang Road 128#, Yangpu District, 200090, Shanghai, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Hu</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jingyi</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Anesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shenyang Road 128#, Yangpu District, 200090, Shanghai, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Huang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Shaoqiang</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Anesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shenyang Road 128#, Yangpu District, 200090, Shanghai, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">29/1(2015-02-01), 141-144</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1387-1307</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">29:1&lt;141</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">29</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10877</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
