Comparison of the effects of various airway devices on hemodynamic response and QTc interval in rabbits under general anesthesia

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Huseyin Toman, Mesut Erbas, Hasan Sahin, Hasan Kiraz, Metehan Uzun, Mehmet Ovali]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 29/6(2015-12-01), 727-732
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605509913
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605509913
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100643.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20151201xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10877-015-9659-x  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10877-015-9659-x 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of the effects of various airway devices on hemodynamic response and QTc interval in rabbits under general anesthesia  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Huseyin Toman, Mesut Erbas, Hasan Sahin, Hasan Kiraz, Metehan Uzun, Mehmet Ovali] 
520 3 |a In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of various airway devices on QTc interval in rabbits under general anesthesia. The subjects were randomly separated into four groups: Group ETT, Group LMA, Group PLA, Group V-gel. Baseline values and hearth rate, mean arterial pressure and ECG was obtained at the 1st, 5th and 30thminutes after administration of anesthesia and placement of airway device and, QTc interval was evaluated. Difference was observed between ET group and V-gel group in the 5thminute mean arterial pressure values (p<0.05). It was observed that QTc intervals at the 1st and 5thminute in the ET group significantly increased when compared with the other groups (p<0.05). Again, it was observed that QTc interval of ET group at the 15th and 30th minute was longer when compared with PLA and V-gel groups (p<0.05). It was also observed that QTc interval of LMA Group at the 5thminute after intubation significantly increased when compared with V-gel group (p<0.05). It was observed that HR values of ETT group at the 1st, 5th and 15thminutes after intubation increased with regards to PLA and V-gel groups (p<0.05). It was determined that the 30thminute hearth rate of ETT group was higher when compared to V-gel group (p<0.05). Conclusion: In our study we observed that V-gel Rabbit affected both hemodynamic response and QT interval less than other airway devices. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2015 
690 7 |a Endotracheal intubation  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Laryngeal mask airway  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Cobra PLA  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a V-gel Rabbit  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Supraglottic airway  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a QTc  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Hemodynamic response  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Toman  |D Huseyin  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17100, Canakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Erbas  |D Mesut  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17100, Canakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sahin  |D Hasan  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17100, Canakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kiraz  |D Hasan  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17100, Canakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Uzun  |D Metehan  |u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ovali  |D Mehmet  |u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 29/6(2015-12-01), 727-732  |x 1387-1307  |q 29:6<727  |1 2015  |2 29  |o 10877 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9659-x  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9659-x  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Toman  |D Huseyin  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17100, Canakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Erbas  |D Mesut  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17100, Canakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Sahin  |D Hasan  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17100, Canakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Kiraz  |D Hasan  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17100, Canakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Uzun  |D Metehan  |u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Ovali  |D Mehmet  |u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 29/6(2015-12-01), 727-732  |x 1387-1307  |q 29:6<727  |1 2015  |2 29  |o 10877