Dynamic device properties of pulse contour cardiac output during transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Martin Petzoldt, Carsten Riedel, Jan Braeunig, Sebastian Haas, Matthias Goepfert, Hendrik Treede, Stephan Baldus, Alwin Goetz, Daniel Reuter]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 29/3(2015-06-01), 323-331
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605510040
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605510040
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100644.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150601xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10877-014-9630-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10877-014-9630-2 
245 0 0 |a Dynamic device properties of pulse contour cardiac output during transcatheter aortic valve implantation  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Martin Petzoldt, Carsten Riedel, Jan Braeunig, Sebastian Haas, Matthias Goepfert, Hendrik Treede, Stephan Baldus, Alwin Goetz, Daniel Reuter] 
520 3 |a This prospective single-center study aimed to determine the responsiveness and diagnostic performance of continuous cardiac output (CCO) monitors based on pulse contour analysis compared with invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) during predefined periods of acute circulatory deterioration in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The ability of calibrated (CCOCAL) and self-calibrated (CCOAUTOCAL) pulse contour analysis to detect the hemodynamic response to 37 episodes of balloon aortic valvuloplasty enabled by rapid ventricular pacing was quantified in 13 patients undergoing TAVI. A "low” and a "high” cut-off limit were predefined as a 15 or 25 % decrease from baseline respectively. We found no significant differences between CCOCAL and MAP regarding mean response time [low cut-off: 8.6 (7.1-10.5) vs. 8.9 (7.3-10.8) s, p = 0.76; high cut-off: 11.4 (9.7-13.5) vs. 12.6 (10.7-14.9) s, p = 0.32] or diagnostic performance [area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC): 0.99 (0.98-1.0) vs. 1.0 (0.99-1.0), p = 0.46]. But CCOCAL had a significantly higher amplitude response [95.0 (88.7-98.8) % decrease from baseline] than MAP [41.2 (30.0-52.9) %, p < 0.001]. CCOAUTOCAL had a significantly lower AUC [0.83 (0.73-0.93), p < 0.001] than MAP. Moreover, CCOCAL detected hemodynamic recovery significantly earlier than MAP. In conclusion, CCOCAL and MAP provided equivalent responsiveness and diagnostic performance to detect acute circulatory depression, whereas CCOAUTOCAL appeared to be less appropriate. In contrast to CCOCAL the amplitude response of MAP was poor. Consequently even small response amplitudes of MAP could indicate severe decreases in CO. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014 
690 7 |a Pulse contour analysis  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Cardiac output  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Monitoring  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Hemodynamic  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Valvuloplasty  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Aortic valve  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a TAVI  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Petzoldt  |D Martin  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Riedel  |D Carsten  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Braeunig  |D Jan  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Haas  |D Sebastian  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Goepfert  |D Matthias  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Treede  |D Hendrik  |u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Baldus  |D Stephan  |u Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Goetz  |D Alwin  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Reuter  |D Daniel  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 29/3(2015-06-01), 323-331  |x 1387-1307  |q 29:3<323  |1 2015  |2 29  |o 10877 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9630-2  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9630-2  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Petzoldt  |D Martin  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Riedel  |D Carsten  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Braeunig  |D Jan  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Haas  |D Sebastian  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Goepfert  |D Matthias  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Treede  |D Hendrik  |u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Baldus  |D Stephan  |u Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Goetz  |D Alwin  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Reuter  |D Daniel  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 29/3(2015-06-01), 323-331  |x 1387-1307  |q 29:3<323  |1 2015  |2 29  |o 10877