The evaluation of a non-invasive respiratory volume monitor in surgical patients undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Christopher Voscopoulos, C. MacNabb, Jordan Brayanov, Lizeng Qin, Jenny Freeman, Gary Mullen, Diane Ladd, Edward George]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 29/2(2015-04-01), 223-230
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605510474
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605510474
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100646.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150401xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10877-014-9596-0  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10877-014-9596-0 
245 0 4 |a The evaluation of a non-invasive respiratory volume monitor in surgical patients undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Christopher Voscopoulos, C. MacNabb, Jordan Brayanov, Lizeng Qin, Jenny Freeman, Gary Mullen, Diane Ladd, Edward George] 
520 3 |a Continuous respiratory assessment is especially important during post-operative care following extubation. Respiratory depression and subsequent adverse outcomes can arise due to opioid administration and/or residual anesthetics. A non-invasive respiratory volume monitor (RVM) has been developed that provides continuous, real-time, measurements of minute ventilation (MV), tidal volume (TV), and respiratory rate (RR) via a standardized set of thoracic electrodes. Previous work demonstrated accuracy of the RVM versus standard spirometry and its utility in demonstrating response to opioids in postoperative patients. This study evaluated the correlation between RVM measurements of MV, TV and RR to ventilator measurements during general anesthesia (GA). Continuous digital RVM and ventilator traces, as well as RVM measurements of MV, TV and RR, were analyzed from ten patients (mean 62.6±7.4years; body mass index 28.6±5.2kg/m2) undergoing surgery with GA. RVM data were compared to ventilator data and bias, precision and accuracy were calculated. The average MV difference between the RVM and ventilator was −0.10L/min (bias: −1.3%, precision: 6.6%, accuracy: 9.0%. The average TV difference was 40mL (bias: 0.4%, precision: 7.3%, accuracy: 9.1%). The average RR difference was −0.22 breaths/minute (bias: −1.8%, precision: 3.7% accuracy: 4.1%). Correlations between the RVM traces and the ventilator were compared at various points with correlations >0.90 throughout. Pairing the close correlation to ventilator measurements in intubated patients demonstrated by this study with previously described accuracy compared to spirometry in non-intubated patients, the RVM can be considered to have the capability to provide continuity of ventilation monitoring post-extubation This supports the use of real-time continuous RVM measurements to drive post-operative and post-extubation protocols, initiate therapeutic interventions and improve patient safety. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014 
690 7 |a Non-invasive respiratory volume monitoring  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Thoracic bio-impedance  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a General anesthesia  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Ventilation monitoring in non-intubated patients  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Voscopoulos  |D Christopher  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Brigham and Woman's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a MacNabb  |D C.  |u Respiratory Motion, Inc., 411 Waverley Oaks Road, Suite 150, 02452, Waltham, MA, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Brayanov  |D Jordan  |u Respiratory Motion, Inc., 411 Waverley Oaks Road, Suite 150, 02452, Waltham, MA, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Qin  |D Lizeng  |u Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Freeman  |D Jenny  |u Respiratory Motion, Inc., 411 Waverley Oaks Road, Suite 150, 02452, Waltham, MA, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mullen  |D Gary  |u East Carolina Anesthesia Associates, PLLC, Greenville, NC, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ladd  |D Diane  |u Respiratory Motion, Inc., 411 Waverley Oaks Road, Suite 150, 02452, Waltham, MA, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a George  |D Edward  |u Department of Anesthesia, Massachesetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 29/2(2015-04-01), 223-230  |x 1387-1307  |q 29:2<223  |1 2015  |2 29  |o 10877 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9596-0  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9596-0  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Voscopoulos  |D Christopher  |u Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Brigham and Woman's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a MacNabb  |D C.  |u Respiratory Motion, Inc., 411 Waverley Oaks Road, Suite 150, 02452, Waltham, MA, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Brayanov  |D Jordan  |u Respiratory Motion, Inc., 411 Waverley Oaks Road, Suite 150, 02452, Waltham, MA, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Qin  |D Lizeng  |u Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Freeman  |D Jenny  |u Respiratory Motion, Inc., 411 Waverley Oaks Road, Suite 150, 02452, Waltham, MA, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Mullen  |D Gary  |u East Carolina Anesthesia Associates, PLLC, Greenville, NC, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Ladd  |D Diane  |u Respiratory Motion, Inc., 411 Waverley Oaks Road, Suite 150, 02452, Waltham, MA, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a George  |D Edward  |u Department of Anesthesia, Massachesetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 29/2(2015-04-01), 223-230  |x 1387-1307  |q 29:2<223  |1 2015  |2 29  |o 10877