The effects of low-dose ketamine on the analgesia nociception index (ANI) measured with the novel PhysioDoloris™ analgesia monitor: a pilot study

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Laurent Bollag, Clemens Ortner, Srdjan Jelacic, Cyril Rivat, Ruth Landau, Philippe Richebé]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 29/2(2015-04-01), 291-295
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605510598
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605510598
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100646.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150401xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10877-014-9600-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10877-014-9600-8 
245 0 4 |a The effects of low-dose ketamine on the analgesia nociception index (ANI) measured with the novel PhysioDoloris™ analgesia monitor: a pilot study  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Laurent Bollag, Clemens Ortner, Srdjan Jelacic, Cyril Rivat, Ruth Landau, Philippe Richebé] 
520 3 |a The PhysioDoloris™ analgesia monitor assesses nociception effects on the autonomic nervous system by analyzing changes in heart rate variability (HRV). This non-invasive device analyses ECG signals and determines the analgesia nociception index (ANI), allowing for quantitative assessment of the analgesia/nociception balance in anesthetized patients. Ketamine, an analgesic adjuvant with sympathomimetic properties, has been shown to improve perioperative pain management. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate whether low-dose ketamine, due to its intrinsic effect on the sino-atrial node, affects HRV and, therefore, interferes with ANI measurements. This pilot study included 20 women undergoing abdominal hysterectomies. Anesthesia and analgesia were maintained with sevoflurane and fentanyl respectively, in a standardized manner. Five minutes after intubation, 0.5μgkg−1 of intravenous (i.v.) ketamine was administered. ANI, bispectral index (BIS), heart rate and blood pressure were recorded from the induction of anesthesia until 5min after skin incision. There was not any significant decrease in mean (±SD) ANI values after intubation (2.11±20.11, p=0.35) or i.v. ketamine administration (1.31±15.26, p=0.28). The mean (±SD) reduction in ANI values after skin incision was statistically significant (13.65±15.44, p=0.01), which is consistent with increased nociception. A single i.v. bolus of 0.5μgkg−1 ketamine did not influence the ANI values of 20 women under standardized general anesthesia conditions and absent noxious stimulation. These results suggest that the ANI derived from the PhysioDoloris™ analgesia monitor is feasible under such clinical conditions. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014 
690 7 |a Analgesia monitoring  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Equipment  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a PhysioDoloris™ analgesia monitor  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Ketamine  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Bollag  |D Laurent  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ortner  |D Clemens  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Jelacic  |D Srdjan  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rivat  |D Cyril  |u Institut des Neurosciences de Montpellier (INM), Université de Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Landau  |D Ruth  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Richebé  |D Philippe  |u Department of Anesthesiology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 29/2(2015-04-01), 291-295  |x 1387-1307  |q 29:2<291  |1 2015  |2 29  |o 10877 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9600-8  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9600-8  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Bollag  |D Laurent  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Ortner  |D Clemens  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Jelacic  |D Srdjan  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Rivat  |D Cyril  |u Institut des Neurosciences de Montpellier (INM), Université de Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Landau  |D Ruth  |u Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Richebé  |D Philippe  |u Department of Anesthesiology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 29/2(2015-04-01), 291-295  |x 1387-1307  |q 29:2<291  |1 2015  |2 29  |o 10877