<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605515883</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100711.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20151201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00205-015-0890-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00205-015-0890-x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Optimal Flux Densities for Linear Mappings and the Multiscale Geometry of Structured Deformations</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[David Owen, Roberto Paroni]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">We establish the unexpected equality of the optimal volume density of total flux of a linear vector field $${x \longmapsto Mx}$$ x ⟼ M x and the least volume fraction that can be swept out by submacroscopic switches, separations, and interpenetrations associated with the purely submacroscopic structured deformation (i, I+M). This equality is established first by identifying a dense set $${\mathcal{S}}$$ S of $${N{\times}N}$$ N × N matrices M for which the optimal total flux density equals |trM|, the absolute value of the trace of M. We then use known representation formulae for relaxed energies for structured deformations to show that the desired least volume fraction associated with (i, I+M) also equals |trM|. We also refine the above result by showing the equality of the optimal volume density of the positive part of the flux of $${x \longmapsto Mx}$$ x ⟼ M x and the volume fraction swept out by submacroscopic separations alone, with common value (trM)+. Similarly, the optimal volume density of the negative part of the flux of $${x \longmapsto Mx}$$ x ⟼ M x and the volume fraction swept out by submacroscopic switches and interpenetrations are shown to have the common value (trM)−.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Owen</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Mathematical Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, 15213, Pittsburgh, PA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Paroni</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Roberto</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">DADU, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Palazzo del Pou Salit, Piazza Duomo, 07041, Alghero, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">218/3(2015-12-01), 1633-1652</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0003-9527</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">218:3&lt;1633</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">218</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">205</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-015-0890-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-015-0890-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Owen</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Mathematical Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, 15213, Pittsburgh, PA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Paroni</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Roberto</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">DADU, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Palazzo del Pou Salit, Piazza Duomo, 07041, Alghero, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">218/3(2015-12-01), 1633-1652</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0003-9527</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">218:3&lt;1633</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">218</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">205</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
