<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605518378</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100725.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00572-014-0592-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00572-014-0592-5</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Plant functional traits and phylogenetic relatedness explain variation in associations with root fungal endophytes in an extreme arid environment</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Mónica Lugo, Kurt Reinhart, Eugenia Menoyo, Esteban Crespo, Carlos Urcelay]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Since root endophytes may ameliorate drought stress, understanding which plants associate with endophytes is important, especially in arid ecosystems. Here, the root endophytes were characterized of 42 plants from an arid region of Argentina. Colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and dark septate endophytes (DSEs) was related to plant functional type (PFT), family, and phylogenetic relatedness. Overall, three main findings were observed. Firstly, only moderate levels of endophyte associations were found across all taxa (e.g., most Poaceae were not colonized by endophytes despite numerous accounts of colonization by AMF and DSEs). We determined 69% of plant taxa associated with some form of root endophyte but levels were lower than other regional studies. Secondly, comparisons by PFT and phylogeny were often qualitatively similar (e.g., succulents and Portulacineae consistently lacked AMF; variation occurred among terrestrial vs. epiphytic bromeliads) and often differed from comparisons based on plant family. Thirdly, comparisons by plant family often failed to account for important variation either within families (e.g., Bromeliaceae and Poaceae) or trait conservatism among related families (i.e., Rosidae consistently lacked DSEs and Portulacineae lacked AMF). This study indicates the value of comparing numerous taxa based on PFTs and phylogenetic similarity. Overall, the results suggest an uncertain benefit of endophytes in extremely arid environments where plant traits like succulence may obviate the need to establish associations.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Dark septate endophytes</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Functional traits</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Phylogenetic trait conservatism</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Phylogenetic trait divergence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Xeric environment</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Lugo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Mónica</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">IMIBIO-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, 5700, San Luis, Argentina</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Reinhart</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kurt</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Fort Keogh Livestock &amp; Range Research Laboratory, 243 Fort Keogh Road, 59301-4016, Miles City, MT, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Menoyo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Eugenia</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">IMIBIO-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, 5700, San Luis, Argentina</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Crespo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Esteban</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">IMIBIO-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, 5700, San Luis, Argentina</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Urcelay</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Carlos</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">IMBIV-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CC 495, 5000, Córdoba, Argentina</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Mycorrhiza</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">25/2(2015-02-01), 85-95</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0940-6360</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">25:2&lt;85</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">25</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">572</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-014-0592-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-014-0592-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Lugo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Mónica</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">IMIBIO-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, 5700, San Luis, Argentina</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Reinhart</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kurt</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Fort Keogh Livestock &amp; Range Research Laboratory, 243 Fort Keogh Road, 59301-4016, Miles City, MT, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Menoyo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Eugenia</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">IMIBIO-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, 5700, San Luis, Argentina</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Crespo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Esteban</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">IMIBIO-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, 5700, San Luis, Argentina</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Urcelay</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Carlos</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">IMBIV-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CC 495, 5000, Córdoba, Argentina</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Mycorrhiza</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">25/2(2015-02-01), 85-95</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0940-6360</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">25:2&lt;85</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">25</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">572</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
