<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605519781</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100732.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20151201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11009-014-9432-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11009-014-9432-5</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Víšek</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jan</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, Charles University, Opletalova 26, Prague, The Czech Republic</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Estimating the Model with Fixed and Random Effects by a Robust Method</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Jan Víšek]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Regression model with fixed and random effects estimated by modified versions of the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) is a standard tool of panel data analysis. However, it is vulnerable to the bad effects of influential observations (contamination and/or atypical observations). The paper offers robustified versions of the classical methods for this framework. The robustification is carried out by the same idea which was employed when robustifying OLS, it is the idea of weighting down the large order statistics of squared residuals. In contrast to the approach based on the M-estimators this approach does not need the studentization of residuals to reach the scale- and regression-equivariance of estimator in question. Moreover, such approach is not vulnerable with respect the inliers. The numerical study reveals the reliability of the respective algorithm. The results of this study were collected in a file which is possible to find on web, address is given below. Patterns of these results were included also into the paper. The possibility to reach nearly the full efficiency of estimation - due to the iteratively tailored weight function - in the case when there are no influential points is also demonstrated.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Linear regression model</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">The least weighted squares</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Fixed and random effects</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Numerical simulations</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">17/4(2015-12-01), 999-1014</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1387-5841</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">17:4&lt;999</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">17</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11009</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-014-9432-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-014-9432-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Víšek</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jan</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, Charles University, Opletalova 26, Prague, The Czech Republic</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">17/4(2015-12-01), 999-1014</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1387-5841</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">17:4&lt;999</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">17</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11009</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
