Artificial watering points are focal points for activity by an invasive herbivore but not native herbivores in conservation reserves in arid Australia

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Mike Letnic, Shawn Laffan, Aaron Greenville, Benjamin Russell, Bruce Mitchell, Peter Fleming]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Biodiversity and Conservation, 24/1(2015-01-01), 1-16
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605526281
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605526281
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100802.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150101xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10531-014-0770-y  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10531-014-0770-y 
245 0 0 |a Artificial watering points are focal points for activity by an invasive herbivore but not native herbivores in conservation reserves in arid Australia  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Mike Letnic, Shawn Laffan, Aaron Greenville, Benjamin Russell, Bruce Mitchell, Peter Fleming] 
520 3 |a The spatial configuration of landscapes can be an important factor influencing the dispersal, distribution and abundance of invasive animals and consequently their impacts. In arid landscapes worldwide, humans have increased the availability of surface water by creating artificial water points (AWP) for livestock and wildlife viewing. The resource subsidy provided by AWP can influence the functioning of arid ecosystems by affecting the density, distribution and activity of water-dependent native and invasive animals and thus facilitate their trophic and competitive interactions. In this study, we used dung count indices to investigate the activity of an invasive herbivore, feral goats (Capra hircus), and native herbivores (kangaroos, Macropus spp.) in relation to surface water and habitat type in three conservation reserves located in arid Australia. Activity of feral goats showed a strong preference for rocky ranges habitat and decreased with distance from water. Kangaroo activity showed a strong preference for mulga woodlands, but was independent of distance from water. Our results suggest that artificial water points may exacerbate the impacts of feral goats by functioning as focal points for their activity. Restricting goats' access to water by closure of water points or strategic fencing, such that the mean distance to water across the landscape is increased, may be an effective strategy to reduce goat grazing impacts in conservation reserves where natural sources of water are scarce but is unlikely to affect the grazing patterns of kangaroos. Our study suggests that there is scope to control populations of water-dependent invasive vertebrates in arid regions by restricting their access to artificial water points. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014 
690 7 |a AWP  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Grazing  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Kangaroo  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Invasive species  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Pest animal management  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Resource subsidy  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Dung count  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Letnic  |D Mike  |u Centre for Ecosystem Science and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, 2052, Sydney, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Laffan  |D Shawn  |u Centre for Ecosystem Science and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, 2052, Sydney, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Greenville  |D Aaron  |u Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Russell  |D Benjamin  |u Pest and Ecological Management Unit, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1967, 2220, Hurstville, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mitchell  |D Bruce  |u Pest and Ecological Management Unit, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1967, 2220, Hurstville, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Fleming  |D Peter  |u Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, Biosecurity New South Wales, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, 1447 Forest Road, 2800, Orange, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Biodiversity and Conservation  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 24/1(2015-01-01), 1-16  |x 0960-3115  |q 24:1<1  |1 2015  |2 24  |o 10531 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0770-y  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0770-y  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Letnic  |D Mike  |u Centre for Ecosystem Science and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, 2052, Sydney, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Laffan  |D Shawn  |u Centre for Ecosystem Science and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, 2052, Sydney, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Greenville  |D Aaron  |u Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Russell  |D Benjamin  |u Pest and Ecological Management Unit, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1967, 2220, Hurstville, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Mitchell  |D Bruce  |u Pest and Ecological Management Unit, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1967, 2220, Hurstville, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Fleming  |D Peter  |u Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, Biosecurity New South Wales, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, 1447 Forest Road, 2800, Orange, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Biodiversity and Conservation  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 24/1(2015-01-01), 1-16  |x 0960-3115  |q 24:1<1  |1 2015  |2 24  |o 10531