Restricted by borders: trade-offs in transboundary conservation planning for large river systems
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605526532 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100803.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20150601xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s10531-015-0864-1 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10531-015-0864-1 | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Restricted by borders: trade-offs in transboundary conservation planning for large river systems |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Anna Dolezsai, Péter Sály, Péter Takács, Virgilio Hermoso, Tibor Erős] |
| 520 | 3 | |a Effective conservation of freshwater biodiversity requires accounting for connectivity and the propagation of threats along river networks. With this in mind, the selection of areas to conserve freshwater biodiversity is challenging when rivers cross multiple jurisdictional boundaries. We used systematic conservation planning to identify priority conservation areas for freshwater fish conservation in Hungary (Central Europe). We evaluated the importance of transboundary rivers to achieve conservation goals by systematically deleting some rivers from the prioritization procedure in Marxan and assessing the trade-offs between complexity of conservation recommendations (e.g., conservation areas located exclusively within Hungary vs. transboundary) and cost (area required). We found that including the segments of the largest transboundary rivers (i.e. Danube, Tisza) in the area selection procedure yielded smaller total area compared with the scenarios which considered only smaller national and transboundary rivers. However, analyses which did not consider these large river segments still showed that fish diversity in Hungary can be effectively protected within the country's borders in a relatively small total area (less than 20% of the country's size). Since the protection of large river segments is an unfeasible task, we suggest that transboundary cooperation should focus on the protection of highland riverine habitats (especially Dráva and Ipoly Rivers) and their valuable fish fauna, in addition to the protection of smaller national rivers and streams. Our approach highlights the necessity of examining different options for selecting priority areas for conservation in countries where transboundary river systems form the major part of water resources. | |
| 540 | |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2015 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Freshwater conservation areas |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Systematic conservation planning |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Marxan |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Rivers |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Fish |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dolezsai |D Anna |u Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg K. u. 3, H-8237, Tihany, Hungary |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sály |D Péter |u Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg K. u. 3, H-8237, Tihany, Hungary |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Takács |D Péter |u Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg K. u. 3, H-8237, Tihany, Hungary |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hermoso |D Virgilio |u Australian Rivers Institute and Tropical Rivers and Coastal Knowledge, National Environmental Research Program Northern Australia Hub, Griffith University, 4111, Nathan, QLD, Australia |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Erős |D Tibor |u Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg K. u. 3, H-8237, Tihany, Hungary |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Biodiversity and Conservation |d Springer Netherlands |g 24/6(2015-06-01), 1403-1421 |x 0960-3115 |q 24:6<1403 |1 2015 |2 24 |o 10531 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0864-1 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0864-1 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Dolezsai |D Anna |u Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg K. u. 3, H-8237, Tihany, Hungary |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Sály |D Péter |u Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg K. u. 3, H-8237, Tihany, Hungary |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Takács |D Péter |u Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg K. u. 3, H-8237, Tihany, Hungary |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Hermoso |D Virgilio |u Australian Rivers Institute and Tropical Rivers and Coastal Knowledge, National Environmental Research Program Northern Australia Hub, Griffith University, 4111, Nathan, QLD, Australia |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Erős |D Tibor |u Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg K. u. 3, H-8237, Tihany, Hungary |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Biodiversity and Conservation |d Springer Netherlands |g 24/6(2015-06-01), 1403-1421 |x 0960-3115 |q 24:6<1403 |1 2015 |2 24 |o 10531 | ||