Why taxonomists and ecologists are not, but should be, carpooling?
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605526869 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100805.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20150701xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s10531-015-0899-3 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10531-015-0899-3 | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Why taxonomists and ecologists are not, but should be, carpooling? |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Panu Halme, Saija Kuusela, Aino Juslén] |
| 520 | 3 | |a Traditionally, ecologists and taxonomists have conducted mostly separated research. Ecologists have been using the well-known species groups as their model organisms for practical reasons, whereas taxonomists have focused on poorly known species groups. Extensive collaboration between these research fields has unfortunately been a rarity. We argue that increased collaboration between ecologists and taxonomists yields benefits through several pathways. Firstly, it improves the scientific quality of both disciplines through deeper insight on the study organisms and increased feasibility of the collected data. Secondly, it improves the prospects of the scientists involved and opens up potential funding sources, helping to solve the taxonomic impediment. Finally, improved collaboration could balance ecological research towards more species-rich, functionally important groups. This would increase the quality and effectiveness of nature conservation and management plans positively affecting the sustainability of environmental policy making. These obvious benefits should be swiftly acknowledged by research institutions, science leaders and funding bodies. They should actively promote for strong collaborative efforts from the present and recruited staff representing both disciplines. | |
| 540 | |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2015 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Collaboration |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Conservation biology |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Funding agencies |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Research funding |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Systematics |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Taxonomic impediment |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Halme |D Panu |u Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyvaskyla, P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyvaskyla, Finland |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kuusela |D Saija |u Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140, 00251, Helsinki, Finland |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Juslén |D Aino |u Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 17, 00014, Helsinki, Finland |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Biodiversity and Conservation |d Springer Netherlands |g 24/7(2015-07-01), 1831-1836 |x 0960-3115 |q 24:7<1831 |1 2015 |2 24 |o 10531 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0899-3 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0899-3 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Halme |D Panu |u Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyvaskyla, P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyvaskyla, Finland |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Kuusela |D Saija |u Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140, 00251, Helsinki, Finland |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Juslén |D Aino |u Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 17, 00014, Helsinki, Finland |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Biodiversity and Conservation |d Springer Netherlands |g 24/7(2015-07-01), 1831-1836 |x 0960-3115 |q 24:7<1831 |1 2015 |2 24 |o 10531 | ||