caa a22 4500 605528314 CHVBK 20210128100812.0 cr unu---uuuuu 210128e20151001xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s10531-015-0966-9 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10531-015-0966-9 Amphibians and conservation breeding programmes: do all threatened amphibians belong on the ark? [Elektronische Daten] [Benjamin Tapley, Kay Bradfield, Christopher Michaels, Mike Bungard] Amphibians are facing an extinction crisis, and conservation breeding programmes are a tool used to prevent imminent species extinctions. Compared to mammals and birds, amphibians are considered ideal candidates for these programmes due to their small body size and low space requirements, high fecundity, applicability of reproductive technologies, short generation time, lack of parental care, hard wired behaviour, low maintenance requirements, relative cost effectiveness of such programmes, the success of several amphibian conservation breeding programmes and because captive husbandry capacity exists. Superficially, these reasons appear sound and conservation breeding has improved the conservation status of several amphibian species, however it is impossible to make generalisations about the biology or geo-political context of an entire class. Many threatened amphibian species fail to meet criteria that are commonly cited as reasons why amphibians are suitable for conservation breeding programmes. There are also limitations associated with maintaining populations of amphibians in the zoo and private sectors, and these could potentially undermine the success of conservation breeding programmes and reintroductions. We recommend that species that have been assessed as high priorities for ex situ conservation action are subsequently individually reassessed to determine their suitability for inclusion in conservation breeding programmes. The limitations and risks of maintaining ex situ populations of amphibians need to be considered from the outset and, where possible, mitigated. This should improve programme success rates and ensure that the limited funds dedicated to ex situ amphibian conservation are allocated to projects which have the greatest chance of success. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2015 Capacity building nationallicence Captive breeding nationallicence Husbandry nationallicence Zoo nationallicence Tapley Benjamin Zoological Society of London, Regent's park, London, UK aut Bradfield Kay Perth Zoo, 20 Labouchere Road, South Perth, WA, Australia aut Michaels Christopher Zoological Society of London, Regent's park, London, UK aut Bungard Mike Paignton Zoo, Totnes Road, Paignton, Devon, UK aut Biodiversity and Conservation Springer Netherlands 24/11(2015-10-01), 2625-2646 0960-3115 24:11<2625 2015 24 10531 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0966-9 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence 1 review-article jats NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0966-9 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Tapley Benjamin Zoological Society of London, Regent's park, London, UK aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Bradfield Kay Perth Zoo, 20 Labouchere Road, South Perth, WA, Australia aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Michaels Christopher Zoological Society of London, Regent's park, London, UK aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Bungard Mike Paignton Zoo, Totnes Road, Paignton, Devon, UK aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Biodiversity and Conservation Springer Netherlands 24/11(2015-10-01), 2625-2646 0960-3115 24:11<2625 2015 24 10531