Development and application of an aggregate adherence metric derived from population pharmacokinetics to inform clinical trial enrichment

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Jonathan Knights, Shashank Rohatagi]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 42/3(2015-06-01), 263-273
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605533865
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605533865
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100840.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150601xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10928-015-9414-4  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10928-015-9414-4 
245 0 0 |a Development and application of an aggregate adherence metric derived from population pharmacokinetics to inform clinical trial enrichment  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Jonathan Knights, Shashank Rohatagi] 
520 3 |a Nonadherence to prescribed medication is a common barrier to effective treatment, and current options to determine adherence are limited. This study describes development of an aggregate adherence measure based on population pharmacokinetics (PK), and its comparison to a subjective questionnaire, the Morisky 8-item medication adherence scale (MMAS8), in a trial of psychiatric patients on stable doses of oral aripiprazole. A comprehensive model was first built using plasma drug concentration data from 24 clinical studies comprising 448 patients with over 13,500 observations. Application of this model to independent patient profiles for a given drug-dosing regimen were used to generate the primary aggregate adherence metric, a ratio of observed versus expected plasma exposures at steady-state. Although the metric is capable of comparing relative adherence across groups, simulations showed that the metric is not sufficiently sensitive as an individual diagnostic in all cases. There were no trends observed between results from calculated aggregate adherence metrics and total scores from MMAS8 in a single-visit clinical trial of 47 patients with bipolar 1 disorder or schizophrenia who were on stable doses of aripiprazole, although a strong association was observed for one MMAS8 question. The range of the metric calculated for patients was between 0.16 and 3.15. The described approach of a novel "reverse” application of population PK to quantify relative adherence with an aggregate measure may be influential for both clinical and pharmacometric communities. 
540 |a The Author(s), 2015 
690 7 |a Aggregate adherence metric  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Population pharmacokinetics  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Steady-state plasma drug concentrations  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Simulation  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Aripiprazole  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Knights  |D Jonathan  |u Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., 508 Carnegie Center Blvd. Suite 300, 08540, Princeton, NJ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rohatagi  |D Shashank  |u Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., 508 Carnegie Center Blvd. Suite 300, 08540, Princeton, NJ, USA  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 42/3(2015-06-01), 263-273  |x 1567-567X  |q 42:3<263  |1 2015  |2 42  |o 10928 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-015-9414-4  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-015-9414-4  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Knights  |D Jonathan  |u Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., 508 Carnegie Center Blvd. Suite 300, 08540, Princeton, NJ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Rohatagi  |D Shashank  |u Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., 508 Carnegie Center Blvd. Suite 300, 08540, Princeton, NJ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 42/3(2015-06-01), 263-273  |x 1567-567X  |q 42:3<263  |1 2015  |2 42  |o 10928