Monetary policy and sovereign debt: Does the ECB take the eurozone's fiscal risks into account?

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Andrew Hughes Hallett, John Lewis]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Empirica, 42/3(2015-08-01), 499-520
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605534365
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605534365
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100842.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150801xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10663-014-9260-4  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10663-014-9260-4 
245 0 0 |a Monetary policy and sovereign debt: Does the ECB take the eurozone's fiscal risks into account?  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Andrew Hughes Hallett, John Lewis] 
520 3 |a In the standard Taylor rule, fiscal variables are absent and the central bank is assumed to respond in the same way to a given inflation-output gap outlook regardless of the stance of fiscal policy or the outlook for government debt. This paper puts that assumption to the test. Estimating Taylor rules for the ECB using real time data, we find that there is no direct response to the usual instrument of fiscal policy, the cyclical adjusted primary balance. But there is a clear response to the level of debt. Monetary policy tightens by 25 basis points for every 2.5pp rise in the expected debt to GDP ratio. With ex-post data, we see the opposite: the ECB appears, unfairly since they didn't have the data, to have acted as if it loosened in periods with a forecasted debt build-up (i.e. in recessions), but tightened in response to past fiscal excesses. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014 
690 7 |a Policy co-ordination  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Fiscal policy  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Monetary policy  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Real time data  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Hughes Hallett  |D Andrew  |u School of Public Policy, George Mason University, George Mason School of Public Policy, 3350 N. Fairfax Drive, MS 3B1, 22201, Arlington, VA, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lewis  |D John  |u Economics and Research Department, De Nederlandsche Bank, PO Box 98, 1000AB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Empirica  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 42/3(2015-08-01), 499-520  |x 0340-8744  |q 42:3<499  |1 2015  |2 42  |o 10663 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-014-9260-4  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-014-9260-4  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Hughes Hallett  |D Andrew  |u School of Public Policy, George Mason University, George Mason School of Public Policy, 3350 N. Fairfax Drive, MS 3B1, 22201, Arlington, VA, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Lewis  |D John  |u Economics and Research Department, De Nederlandsche Bank, PO Box 98, 1000AB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Empirica  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 42/3(2015-08-01), 499-520  |x 0340-8744  |q 42:3<499  |1 2015  |2 42  |o 10663