Socioeconomic structures of the Austrian wealth distribution

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Stefan Humer, Mathias Moser, Matthias Schnetzer]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Empirica, 42/2(2015-05-01), 269-289
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 60553456X
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 60553456X
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100843.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150501xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10663-015-9293-3  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10663-015-9293-3 
245 0 0 |a Socioeconomic structures of the Austrian wealth distribution  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Stefan Humer, Mathias Moser, Matthias Schnetzer] 
520 3 |a This paper provides first-time insights into the socioeconomic specifics of the Austrian wealth distribution. Based on data from the Household Finance and Consumption Survey 2010, we explore patterns of household characteristics associated with the wealth dispersion. Due to the pronounced nonlinear relationship of wealth, we incorporate the complex survey design in quantile regressions to analyze the joint distribution of specific attributes and households net wealth position. Our findings emphasize the role of age, education, the ownership of a main residence and company stakes in order to identify generic households across the distribution. Looking at the top, the results indicate a specific role of being self-employed or having received inheritances. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2015 
690 7 |a Wealth distribution  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Quantile regression  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Household structure  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Humer  |D Stefan  |u Department of Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Moser  |D Mathias  |u Department of Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schnetzer  |D Matthias  |u Chamber of Labour Vienna, Prinz-Eugen-Straße 20-22, 1040, Vienna, Austria  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Empirica  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 42/2(2015-05-01), 269-289  |x 0340-8744  |q 42:2<269  |1 2015  |2 42  |o 10663 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-015-9293-3  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-015-9293-3  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Humer  |D Stefan  |u Department of Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Moser  |D Mathias  |u Department of Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Schnetzer  |D Matthias  |u Chamber of Labour Vienna, Prinz-Eugen-Straße 20-22, 1040, Vienna, Austria  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Empirica  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 42/2(2015-05-01), 269-289  |x 0340-8744  |q 42:2<269  |1 2015  |2 42  |o 10663