<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605538816</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100903.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150901xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11053-014-9250-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11053-014-9250-z</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Carranza</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Emmanuel</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Earth and Oceans, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, 4811, Townsville, QLD, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Data-Driven Evidential Belief Modeling of Mineral Potential Using Few Prospects and Evidence with Missing Values</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Emmanuel Carranza]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Data-driven evidential belief (EB) modeling has already been demonstrated for mineral prospectivity mapping in areas with many (i.e., &gt;20) deposits/prospects (i.e., with indicated/inferred resources). In this paper, EB modeling is applied to a case-study area measuring about 920km2 with 12 known porphyry-Cu prospects and with evidential data layer containing missing values. Porphyry-Cu prospectivity of the same area has been modeled previously using weights-of-evidence modeling, which serves as reference for evaluating the results of EB modeling. Initially, EB modeling was used to quantify spatial associations of the known porphyry-Cu prospects with various geological features perceived to be porphyry-Cu mineralization controls. Spatial associations of the known porphyry-Cu prospects with geochemical data layers with missing values were also quantified. Then, geological and geochemical data layers found to have positive spatial associations with the known porphyry-Cu prospects were used as predictors of porphyry-Cu prospectivity. The results show that EB modeling is as efficient as WofE modeling in predictive modeling of mineral prospectivity in areas with as few as 12 prospects and with evidential data layers containing missing values.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">International Association for Mathematical Geosciences, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Spatial association</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Uncertainty due to missing values</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Porphyry copper</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">GIS</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Natural Resources Research</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">24/3(2015-09-01), 291-304</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1520-7439</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">24:3&lt;291</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">24</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11053</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-014-9250-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-014-9250-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Carranza</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Emmanuel</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Earth and Oceans, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, 4811, Townsville, QLD, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Natural Resources Research</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">24/3(2015-09-01), 291-304</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1520-7439</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">24:3&lt;291</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">24</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11053</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
