Pragmatic Interpretations of Vague Expressions: Strongest Meaning and Nonmonotonic Consequence
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605539103 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100905.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20150801xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s10992-014-9325-7 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10992-014-9325-7 | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Pragmatic Interpretations of Vague Expressions: Strongest Meaning and Nonmonotonic Consequence |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Pablo Cobreros, Paul Egré, Dave Ripley, Robert van Rooij] |
| 520 | 3 | |a Recent experiments have shown that naive speakers find borderline contradictions involving vague predicates acceptable. In Cobreros et al. (Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41, 347-385, 2012a) we proposed a pragmatic explanation of the acceptability of borderline contradictions, building on a three-valued semantics. In a reply, Alxatib et al. (Journal of Philosophical Logic, 42, 619-634, 2013) show, however, that the pragmatic account predicts the wrong interpretations for some examples involving disjunction, and propose as a remedy a semantic analysis instead, based on fuzzy logic. In this paper we provide an explicit global pragmatic interpretation rule, based on a somewhat richer semantics, and show that with its help the problem can be overcome in pragmatics after all. Furthermore, we use this pragmatic interpretation rule to define a new (nonmonotonic) consequence-relation and discuss some of its properties. | |
| 540 | |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Vagueness |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Pragmatics |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Partial logic |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Non-monotonic logic |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cobreros |D Pablo |u University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Egré |D Paul |u Institute Jean-Nicod (CNRS-EHESS-ENS), Paris, France |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ripley |D Dave |u University of Connecticut, Storrs, Mansfields, CT, USA |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van Rooij |D Robert |u Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Journal of Philosophical Logic |d Springer Netherlands |g 44/4(2015-08-01), 375-393 |x 0022-3611 |q 44:4<375 |1 2015 |2 44 |o 10992 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-014-9325-7 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-014-9325-7 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Cobreros |D Pablo |u University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Egré |D Paul |u Institute Jean-Nicod (CNRS-EHESS-ENS), Paris, France |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Ripley |D Dave |u University of Connecticut, Storrs, Mansfields, CT, USA |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a van Rooij |D Robert |u Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Journal of Philosophical Logic |d Springer Netherlands |g 44/4(2015-08-01), 375-393 |x 0022-3611 |q 44:4<375 |1 2015 |2 44 |o 10992 | ||