Representing and Reasoning about Game Strategies

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Dongmo Zhang, Michael Thielscher]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 44/2(2015-04-01), 203-236
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605539189
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605539189
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100905.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150401xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10992-014-9334-6  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10992-014-9334-6 
245 0 0 |a Representing and Reasoning about Game Strategies  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Dongmo Zhang, Michael Thielscher] 
520 3 |a As a contribution to the challenge of building game-playing AI systems, we develop and analyse a formal language for representing and reasoning about strategies. Our logical language builds on the existing general Game Description Language (GDL) and extends it by a standard modality for linear time along with two dual connectives to express preferences when combining strategies. The semantics of the language is provided by a standard state-transition model. As such, problems that require reasoning about games can be solved by the standard methods for reasoning about actions and change. We also endow the language with a specific semantics by which strategy formulas are understood as move recommendations for a player. To illustrate how our formalism supports automated reasoning about strategies, we demonstrate two example methods of implementation: first, we formalise the semantic interpretation of our language in conjunction with game rules and strategy rules in the Situation Calculus; second, we show how the reasoning problem can be solved with Answer Set Programming. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014 
690 7 |a Strategic reasoning  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Reasoning about actions  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a General game playing  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Zhang  |D Dongmo  |u The University of Western Sydney, New South Wales, Australia  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Thielscher  |D Michael  |u The University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Journal of Philosophical Logic  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 44/2(2015-04-01), 203-236  |x 0022-3611  |q 44:2<203  |1 2015  |2 44  |o 10992 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-014-9334-6  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-014-9334-6  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Zhang  |D Dongmo  |u The University of Western Sydney, New South Wales, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Thielscher  |D Michael  |u The University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Philosophical Logic  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 44/2(2015-04-01), 203-236  |x 0022-3611  |q 44:2<203  |1 2015  |2 44  |o 10992