<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605539596</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100907.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150701xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10396-015-0619-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10396-015-0619-3</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Quantitative cervical elastography during pregnancy: influence of setting features on strain calculation</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Arrigo Fruscalzo, Ambrogio Londero, Ralf Schmitz]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Aim: To evaluate the influence on feasibility and reliability of quantitative tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)-based cervical elastography of the cycle phase and of the derivative pitch (DP) selected during tissue strain (TS) calculation across all three trimesters of pregnancy. Materials and methods: The pilot study included 17 patients collected between the 12th and the 42nd week of gestation. The TS was measured by a single operator by quantitative elastography. The influence of DP values (5, 10, 15, and 20mm) and phase (compression versus relaxation) was tested after a cycle of freehand compression and relaxation of the cervix through the vaginal probe. Feasibility and intra-operator intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) agreement for strain measurement were also evaluated for every setting used. Results: TS values were inversely correlated with DP and were slightly higher if measured during a compression phase. TDI-based cervical elastography was feasible in all cases. Reliability for the process of strain calculation of different raw datasets was very good (ICC agreement ranging between 0.79 and 0.87), while excellent considering the same raw dataset (ICC agreement ranging between 0.93 and 0.95). Conclusions: The DP and cycle phase influenced the strain values calculated. Nonetheless, TDI-based cervical elastography was feasible and reliable for all the settings considered.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine, 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Ultrasonography</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Cervical elastography</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Cervix uteri</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Pregnancy</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Reproducibility of results</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Derivative pitch</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Fruscalzo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Arrigo</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Frauenklinik, Mathias-Spital Rheine, Frankenburgstr. 31, 48431, Rheine, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Londero</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ambrogio</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Udine, P.le S. M. Della Misericordia 1, 35100, Udine, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Schmitz</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ralf</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Medical Ultrasonics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Japan</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">42/3(2015-07-01), 387-394</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1346-4523</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">42:3&lt;387</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">42</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10396</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-015-0619-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-015-0619-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Fruscalzo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Arrigo</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Frauenklinik, Mathias-Spital Rheine, Frankenburgstr. 31, 48431, Rheine, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Londero</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ambrogio</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Udine, P.le S. M. Della Misericordia 1, 35100, Udine, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Schmitz</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ralf</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Medical Ultrasonics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Japan</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">42/3(2015-07-01), 387-394</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1346-4523</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">42:3&lt;387</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">42</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10396</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
