Fish intelligence, sentience and ethics

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Culum Brown]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Animal Cognition, 18/1(2015-01-01), 1-17
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605541698
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605541698
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100917.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150101xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10071-014-0761-0  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10071-014-0761-0 
100 1 |a Brown  |D Culum  |u Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, 2109, Sydney, Australia  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Fish intelligence, sentience and ethics  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Culum Brown] 
520 3 |a Fish are one of the most highly utilised vertebrate taxa by humans; they are harvested from wild stocks as part of global fishing industries, grown under intensive aquaculture conditions, are the most common pet and are widely used for scientific research. But fish are seldom afforded the same level of compassion or welfare as warm-blooded vertebrates. Part of the problem is the large gap between people's perception of fish intelligence and the scientific reality. This is an important issue because public perception guides government policy. The perception of an animal's intelligence often drives our decision whether or not to include them in our moral circle. From a welfare perspective, most researchers would suggest that if an animal is sentient, then it can most likely suffer and should therefore be offered some form of formal protection. There has been a debate about fish welfare for decades which centres on the question of whether they are sentient or conscious. The implications for affording the same level of protection to fish as other vertebrates are great, not least because of fishing-related industries. Here, I review the current state of knowledge of fish cognition starting with their sensory perception and moving on to cognition. The review reveals that fish perception and cognitive abilities often match or exceed other vertebrates. A review of the evidence for pain perception strongly suggests that fish experience pain in a manner similar to the rest of the vertebrates. Although scientists cannot provide a definitive answer on the level of consciousness for any non-human vertebrate, the extensive evidence of fish behavioural and cognitive sophistication and pain perception suggests that best practice would be to lend fish the same level of protection as any other vertebrate. 
540 |a Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014 
690 7 |a Fish cognition  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Sentience  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Welfare  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Pain  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Intelligence  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Ethics  |2 nationallicence 
773 0 |t Animal Cognition  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 18/1(2015-01-01), 1-17  |x 1435-9448  |q 18:1<1  |1 2015  |2 18  |o 10071 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0761-0  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a review-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0761-0  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Brown  |D Culum  |u Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, 2109, Sydney, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Animal Cognition  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 18/1(2015-01-01), 1-17  |x 1435-9448  |q 18:1<1  |1 2015  |2 18  |o 10071