Feature- versus rule-based generalization in rats, pigeons and humans

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Elisa Maes, Guido De Filippo, Angus Inkster, Stephen Lea, Jan De Houwer, Rudi D'Hooge, Tom Beckers, Andy Wills]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Animal Cognition, 18/6(2015-11-01), 1267-1284
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605541930
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605541930
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100919.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20151101xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10071-015-0895-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10071-015-0895-8 
245 0 0 |a Feature- versus rule-based generalization in rats, pigeons and humans  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Elisa Maes, Guido De Filippo, Angus Inkster, Stephen Lea, Jan De Houwer, Rudi D'Hooge, Tom Beckers, Andy Wills] 
520 3 |a Humans can spontaneously create rules that allow them to efficiently generalize what they have learned to novel situations. An enduring question is whether rule-based generalization is uniquely human or whether other animals can also abstract rules and apply them to novel situations. In recent years, there have been a number of high-profile claims that animals such as rats can learn rules. Most of those claims are quite weak because it is possible to demonstrate that simple associative systems (which do not learn rules) can account for the behavior in those tasks. Using a procedure that allows us to clearly distinguish feature-based from rule-based generalization (the Shanks-Darby procedure), we demonstrate that adult humans show rule-based generalization in this task, while generalization in rats and pigeons was based on featural overlap between stimuli. In brief, when learning that a stimulus made of two components ("AB”) predicts a different outcome than its elements ("A” and "B”), people spontaneously abstract an opposites rule and apply it to new stimuli (e.g., knowing that "C” and "D” predict one outcome, they will predict that "CD” predicts the opposite outcome). Rats and pigeons show the reverse behavior—they generalize what they have learned, but on the basis of similarity (e.g., "CD” is similar to "C” and "D”, so the same outcome is predicted for the compound stimulus as for the components). Genuinely rule-based behavior is observed in humans, but not in rats and pigeons, in the current procedure. 
540 |a The Author(s), 2015 
690 7 |a Rats  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Pigeons  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Humans  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Generalization  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Rule-based  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Associative models  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Maes  |D Elisa  |u KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, Box 3712, 3000, Leuven, Belgium  |4 aut 
700 1 |a De Filippo  |D Guido  |u Università di Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126, Bologna, Italy  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Inkster  |D Angus  |u Plymouth University, Drake Circus, PL4 8AA, Plymouth, UK  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lea  |D Stephen  |u Washington Singer Laboratories, University of Exeter, EX4 4QG, Exeter, UK  |4 aut 
700 1 |a De Houwer  |D Jan  |u Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium  |4 aut 
700 1 |a D'Hooge  |D Rudi  |u KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, Box 3714, 3000, Leuven, Belgium  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Beckers  |D Tom  |u KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, Box 3712, 3000, Leuven, Belgium  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wills  |D Andy  |u Plymouth University, Drake Circus, PL4 8AA, Plymouth, UK  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Animal Cognition  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 18/6(2015-11-01), 1267-1284  |x 1435-9448  |q 18:6<1267  |1 2015  |2 18  |o 10071 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0895-8  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0895-8  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Maes  |D Elisa  |u KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, Box 3712, 3000, Leuven, Belgium  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a De Filippo  |D Guido  |u Università di Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126, Bologna, Italy  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Inkster  |D Angus  |u Plymouth University, Drake Circus, PL4 8AA, Plymouth, UK  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Lea  |D Stephen  |u Washington Singer Laboratories, University of Exeter, EX4 4QG, Exeter, UK  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a De Houwer  |D Jan  |u Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a D'Hooge  |D Rudi  |u KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, Box 3714, 3000, Leuven, Belgium  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Beckers  |D Tom  |u KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, Box 3712, 3000, Leuven, Belgium  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Wills  |D Andy  |u Plymouth University, Drake Circus, PL4 8AA, Plymouth, UK  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Animal Cognition  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 18/6(2015-11-01), 1267-1284  |x 1435-9448  |q 18:6<1267  |1 2015  |2 18  |o 10071