Pauses enhance chunk recognition in song element strings by zebra finches
Gespeichert in:
Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Michelle Spierings, Anouk de Weger, Carel ten Cate]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Animal Cognition, 18/4(2015-07-01), 867-874
Format:
Artikel (online)
Online Zugang:
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605542287 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100920.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20150701xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s10071-015-0855-3 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10071-015-0855-3 | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Pauses enhance chunk recognition in song element strings by zebra finches |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Michelle Spierings, Anouk de Weger, Carel ten Cate] |
| 520 | 3 | |a When learning a language, it is crucial to know which syllables of a continuous sound string belong together as words. Human infants achieve this by attending to pauses between words or to the co-occurrence of syllables. It is not only humans that can segment a continuous string. Songbirds learning their song tend to copy ‘chunks' from one or more tutors' songs and combine these into their own song. In the tutor songs, these chunks are often separated by pauses and a high co-occurrence of elements, suggestingthat these features affect chunking and song learning. We examined experimentally whether the presence of pauses and element co-occurrence affect the ability of adult zebra finches to discriminate strings of song elements. Using a go/no-go design, two groups of birds were trained to discriminate between two strings. In one group (Pause-group), pauses were inserted between co-occurring element triplets in the strings, and in the other group (No-pause group), both strings were continuous. After making a correct discrimination, an individual proceeded to a reversal training using string segments. Segments were element triplets consistent in co-occurrence, triplets that were partly consistent in composition and triplets consisting of elements that did not co-occur in the strings. The Pause-group was faster in discriminating between the two strings. This group also responded differently to consistent triplets in the reversal training, compared to inconsistent triplets. The No-pause group did not differentiate among the triplet types. These results indicate that pauses in strings of song elements aid song discrimination and memorization of co-occurring element groups. | |
| 540 | |a The Author(s), 2015 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Songbirds |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Zebra finch |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a String learning |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Chunking |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Vocal perception |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Song learning |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Spierings |D Michelle |u Behavioural Biology, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a de Weger |D Anouk |u Behavioural Biology, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a ten Cate |D Carel |u Behavioural Biology, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Animal Cognition |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg |g 18/4(2015-07-01), 867-874 |x 1435-9448 |q 18:4<867 |1 2015 |2 18 |o 10071 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0855-3 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0855-3 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Spierings |D Michelle |u Behavioural Biology, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a de Weger |D Anouk |u Behavioural Biology, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a ten Cate |D Carel |u Behavioural Biology, Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Animal Cognition |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg |g 18/4(2015-07-01), 867-874 |x 1435-9448 |q 18:4<867 |1 2015 |2 18 |o 10071 | ||