To Reflex or Not: Additional BRCA1/2 Testing in Ashkenazi Jewish Individuals Without Founder Mutations

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Nancie Petrucelli, Sarah Mange, Jennifer Fulbright, Lindsay Dohany, Dana Zakalik, Debra Duquette]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24/2(2015-04-01), 285-293
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605545081
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605545081
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100934.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150401xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10897-014-9762-z  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10897-014-9762-z 
245 0 0 |a To Reflex or Not: Additional BRCA1/2 Testing in Ashkenazi Jewish Individuals Without Founder Mutations  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Nancie Petrucelli, Sarah Mange, Jennifer Fulbright, Lindsay Dohany, Dana Zakalik, Debra Duquette] 
520 3 |a This study determined the prevalence of non-Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA1/2 mutations in the Ashkenazi Jewish population in the state of Michigan, current provider testing practices, and the use of mutation probability models in determining which Ashkenazi Jewish individuals should be offered further analysis following negative BRCA1/2 founder testing. Testing patterns, mutation probabilities, and testing results were assessed for 327 Ashkenazi Jewish individuals seen for BRCA1/2 counseling in the state of Michigan who underwent testing for the Ashkenazi Jewish founder mutations. Only one (0.6%) Ashkenazi Jewish individual with sequencing after negative founder analysis was found to have a non-founder mutation; no rearrangements were identified. Testing patterns varied by clinic, with the proportion of Ashkenazi Jewish individuals undergoing additional sequencing ranging from 22.2 to 92.9%. In Ashkenazi Jewish individuals with a pre-test BRCAPRO risk calculation, the mean risk was significantly higher in those with follow-up sequencing compared to those who did not pursue additional testing. The low prevalence of non-founder BRCA1/2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals does not warrant automatically reflexing to full analysis after negative mutation testing. Increased use of mutation probability models may aid in determining which cases warrant additional testing. 
540 |a National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc., 2014 
690 7 |a BRCA1/2  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Ashkenazi Jewish  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Sequencing  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Large rearrangement analysis  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Petrucelli  |D Nancie  |u Cancer Genetic Counseling Service, Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R, HPO3GC, 48201, Detroit, MI, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mange  |D Sarah  |u Lifecourse Epidemiology and Genomics Division, Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, MI, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Fulbright  |D Jennifer  |u Cancer Genetics Program, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Dohany  |D Lindsay  |u Cancer Genetics Program, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Zakalik  |D Dana  |u Cancer Genetics Program, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Duquette  |D Debra  |u Lifecourse Epidemiology and Genomics Division, Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, MI, USA  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Journal of Genetic Counseling  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 24/2(2015-04-01), 285-293  |x 1059-7700  |q 24:2<285  |1 2015  |2 24  |o 10897 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9762-z  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9762-z  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Petrucelli  |D Nancie  |u Cancer Genetic Counseling Service, Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R, HPO3GC, 48201, Detroit, MI, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Mange  |D Sarah  |u Lifecourse Epidemiology and Genomics Division, Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, MI, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Fulbright  |D Jennifer  |u Cancer Genetics Program, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Dohany  |D Lindsay  |u Cancer Genetics Program, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Zakalik  |D Dana  |u Cancer Genetics Program, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Duquette  |D Debra  |u Lifecourse Epidemiology and Genomics Division, Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, MI, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Genetic Counseling  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 24/2(2015-04-01), 285-293  |x 1059-7700  |q 24:2<285  |1 2015  |2 24  |o 10897