caa a22 4500 606153225 CHVBK 20210128100552.0 cr unu---uuuuu 210128e20150801xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s11121-015-0554-y doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11121-015-0554-y Experiences in Disseminating Evidence-Based Prevention Programs in a Real-World Setting [Elektronische Daten] [Inga Frantz, Mark Stemmler, Kurt Hahlweg, Julia Plück, Nina Heinrichs] The primary aim of family-based prevention programs is to promote children's health. Unfortunately, it is difficult to reach families with such evidence-based prevention programs (EBP). Therefore, implementing EBP on a population level could be a promising approach to reach more families, including those faced with socioeconomic challenges who are usually less likely to participate in randomized controlled trials (RCT). Is a population rollout appropriate to reach more and different families than those participating in RCT, especially those representative of the target population? We implemented three EBP in a city in an uncontrolled trial. The effects of this population rollout were tracked on the level of the participating families and on the level of all families living in the city. More than 3480 families (30% of the population) with children up to 12years of age participated based on practitioner report. Analyses indicate that a greater percentage of low socioeconomic-status families attended a program compared with a randomly surveyed sample from the city's general population. The sizes of the within-subject effect for parental strategies, child behavior problems, and children's quality of life for a subsample of n = 411 families were similar to those of other uncontrolled EBP studies. The study contributes to highly needed type 2 translation research. The population-based dissemination of EBP could be a promising approach to reach families at risk. However, there are considerable barriers to the implementation process, which currently limit the effectiveness of this rollout in a community. Society for Prevention Research, 2015 Prevention nationallicence Dissemination nationallicence Implementation nationallicence Parenting nationallicence Child behavior nationallicence Frantz Inga Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany aut Stemmler Mark Department of Psychology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany aut Hahlweg Kurt Department of Psychology, University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany aut Plück Julia Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany aut Heinrichs Nina Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany aut Prevention Science Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com 16/6(2015-08-01), 789-800 1389-4986 16:6<789 2015 16 11121 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0554-y text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0554-y text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Frantz Inga Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Stemmler Mark Department of Psychology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Hahlweg Kurt Department of Psychology, University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Plück Julia Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Heinrichs Nina Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Prevention Science Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com 16/6(2015-08-01), 789-800 1389-4986 16:6<789 2015 16 11121