<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606162003</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100637.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150401xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10526-014-9643-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10526-014-9643-2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Adding &quot;personality” to biocontrol: characterization and suitability of microsatellites for sibship reconstruction in the aphid parasitoid Diaeretiella rapae</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Isabelle Eisele, Rainer Meyhöfer]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Efficiency of natural enemies in pest control in the field frequently shows high degree of variability, making it difficult to propose reliable biocontrol strategies. Due to the small size of many beneficals, underlying mechanisms are difficult to evaluate. In the present study the potential of molecular markers to reconstruct individual foraging decisions of a small parasitoid species unsuitable for direct tracking, i.e. Diaeretiella rapae (M'sIntosh) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a primary parasitoid of the cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae (Linnaeus) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), was evaluated. Nine newly designed microsatellite primer pairs were tested for their reliability in parentage analysis. Therefore, several families of D. rapae with four to six daughters and high or low degree of inbreeding were established in the lab. Individuals were genotyped and parentage and sibship analysis was calculated with the software COLONY. The results indicated that 91% of the 85 genotyped offspring from all families have been assigned to the correct family when all nine microsatellite loci have been used and 86% when only six microsatellite loci have been used. Even in families with high degree of inbreeding up to 87% of the offspring could be assigned correctly. In conclusion, the sibship analysis of D. rapae provides reliable results, especially with all nine selected microsatellite loci. Therefore it will be a valuable tool to reconstruct individual foraging decisions and characterize parasitoid &quot;personality” in the field to improve biological control strategies.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC), 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Molecular marker</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Parentage</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Sibling analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">COLONY software</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Foraging behavior</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Braconidae</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Eisele</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Isabelle</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Section Phytomedicine, Institute of Horticultural Production Systems, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Straße 2, 30419, Hannover, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Meyhöfer</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Rainer</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Section Phytomedicine, Institute of Horticultural Production Systems, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Straße 2, 30419, Hannover, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">BioControl</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">60/2(2015-04-01), 189-197</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1386-6141</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">60:2&lt;189</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">60</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10526</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-014-9643-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-014-9643-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Eisele</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Isabelle</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Section Phytomedicine, Institute of Horticultural Production Systems, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Straße 2, 30419, Hannover, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Meyhöfer</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Rainer</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Section Phytomedicine, Institute of Horticultural Production Systems, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Straße 2, 30419, Hannover, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">BioControl</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">60/2(2015-04-01), 189-197</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1386-6141</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">60:2&lt;189</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">60</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10526</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
