<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606162259</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100638.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150701xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10291-014-0401-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10291-014-0401-9</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Brack</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Andreas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute for Communications and Navigation, Technische Universität München (TUM), Arcisstr. 21, 80333, Munich, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">On reliable data-driven partial GNSS ambiguity resolution</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Andreas Brack]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In high-precision global navigation satellite system applications, it is often not possible to simultaneously meet the requirements for fast and reliable integer ambiguity resolution. For a given reliability constraint in form of a user-defined, tolerable probability of an incorrect ambiguity estimate, resolving a subset of ambiguities instead of the full set can be beneficial. We discuss a fixed failure rate implementation of a data-driven, likelihood-ratio-based partial ambiguity resolution technique. A key problem in this context is the efficient determination of a scalar that is a model-dependent threshold value. This problem is approached via a conservative functional approximation of the threshold value. The only input parameter of the function is the integer least-squares failure rate of the system model under consideration. Numerically simulated single and combined system GPS/Galileo single baseline cases with single- and dual-frequency measurements are used to analyze the impact of the approximation. The results indicate that the conservative description hardly affects the performance of the algorithm, while the predefined failure rate is not exceeded. Moreover, it is shown that the presented data-driven partial ambiguity resolution approach clearly outperforms a purely model-driven scheme based on the bootstrapping failure rate.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Integer ambiguity resolution</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Partial fixing</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Fixed failure rate</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Generalized integer aperture estimation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">GNSS</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">GPS Solutions</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">19/3(2015-07-01), 411-422</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1080-5370</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">19:3&lt;411</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">19</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10291</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0401-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0401-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Brack</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Andreas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute for Communications and Navigation, Technische Universität München (TUM), Arcisstr. 21, 80333, Munich, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">GPS Solutions</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">19/3(2015-07-01), 411-422</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1080-5370</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">19:3&lt;411</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">19</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10291</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
