<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606162585</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100639.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150401xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10291-014-0380-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10291-014-0380-x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="3">
   <subfield code="a">An impact analysis of arc length on orbit prediction and clock estimation for PPP ambiguity resolution</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Yihe Li, Yang Gao, Bofeng Li]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Real-time precise orbit and clock products are crucial for real-time high-precision precise point positioning (PPP). The key for precise orbit prediction is to precisely determine the initial conditions (satellite position, velocity at the initial epoch) and the solar radiation pressure (SRP) parameters using an arc of known precise orbits. The optimal arc length will be investigated for precise orbit prediction, with which the high-accuracy satellite clocks can be estimated. The orbit prediction accuracies with different arc lengths and conditions over time are also investigated. The results indicate that the predicted orbit accuracy is governed by the SRP parameters. In addition, the predicted orbits and estimated clocks are evaluated quantitatively with respect to PPP solutions during in and out of eclipses seasons, based on which the optimal arc length is identified. The numerical results show that high-accuracy orbital prediction can be achieved using an arc length between 36 and 48h and generally an arc length of 42h is considered to be optimal. With this optimal arc length, the estimated clock accuracy is 0.048 and 0.122ns for a prediction interval of 6 and 24h, respectively. The average PPP ambiguity fix-rates with a prediction interval of 6h are 80.2 and 84.7% over an observation period of 30min and 1h, respectively.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Arc length</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Orbit prediction</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">SRP parameters</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Satellite clock estimation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">PPP AR</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Li</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Yihe</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Gao</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Yang</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Li</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Bofeng</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, 200092, Shanghai, People's Republic of China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">GPS Solutions</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">19/2(2015-04-01), 201-213</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1080-5370</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">19:2&lt;201</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">19</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10291</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0380-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0380-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Li</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Yihe</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Gao</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Yang</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Li</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Bofeng</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, 200092, Shanghai, People's Republic of China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">GPS Solutions</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">19/2(2015-04-01), 201-213</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1080-5370</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">19:2&lt;201</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">19</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10291</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
