<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606165924</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100655.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00168-015-0669-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00168-015-0669-x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Housing-bubble vulnerability and diversification opportunities during housing boom-bust cycles: evidence from decomposition of asset price returns</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[MeiChi Huang, Tzu-Chien Wang]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This paper examines the implications of housing-bubble vulnerability and time-varying risk management extracted from permanent-transitory ratios of asset price returns, which measure the relative importance of permanent and transitory shocks to asset markets. We extend the unobserved components model, which divides asset price returns into permanent and transitory components, to investigate the interrelations across housing assets, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and stocks in the USA. After 1984, which is the estimated break point in cross-asset interactions, many metropolitan statistical area-level housing markets display vulnerability to housing bubbles due to high permanent-transitory ratios, which suggests weak monetary policy effectiveness in stabilizing the housing boom-bust cycles. Households can diversify long-run risks by establishing stock-housing and REIT-stock portfolios after 1984, but they have fewer diversification opportunities in the post-1984 subperiod than in the pre-1984 subperiod.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Huang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">MeiChi</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Business Administration, National Taipei University, 151, University Rd., San Shia District, 23741, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Wang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Tzu-Chien</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Discipline of Finance, College of Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, ROC</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">The Annals of Regional Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">54/2(2015-03-01), 605-637</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0570-1864</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">54:2&lt;605</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">54</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">168</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0669-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0669-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Huang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">MeiChi</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Business Administration, National Taipei University, 151, University Rd., San Shia District, 23741, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Wang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Tzu-Chien</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Discipline of Finance, College of Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, ROC</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">The Annals of Regional Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">54/2(2015-03-01), 605-637</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0570-1864</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">54:2&lt;605</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">54</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">168</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
