<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606166696</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100659.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20151201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10665-014-9721-6</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10665-014-9721-6</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Soldatos</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kostas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Mathematical Sciences and Spencer Institute of Theoretical and Computational Mechanics, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, Nottingham, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The bimodal theory of plasticity II: polar material response</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Kostas Soldatos]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Based on arguments of the invariant theory of tensor representations, the first part of this study [Soldatos, J Mech Phys Solids 59:1576-1595, 2011] generalised the experimentally established theory of bimodal plasticity in a manner which elucidates its physical and mathematical connection with the plasticity theory of ideal fibre-reinforced solids. The present, second, part of the study deals with a major relevant question which remains unanswered and refers to the considerable deviation which the plastic-strain vector has shown in experiments from the normal to the yield surface direction. The described flow rule discrepancy is resolved here by reconsidering the standard assumption of perfectly flexible fibres. All previously established experimental and theoretical results and observations which refer to bimodal plasticity remain intact and guide this investigation, which, however, postulates further that strong fibres possess bending stiffness. In turn, fibre resistance in bending implies the presence of couple stress and non-symmetric stress, and as a result, the plastic response of the fibrous composite acquires features of polar material behaviour. The resulting polar material version of the bimodal plasticity model provides a convincing explanation, as well as the reasons behind the failure of symmetric-stress (non-polar material) plasticity to conform to well-known and well-established principles of plastic flow. It is thus seen that if polar plastic behaviour is erroneously described with arguments of symmetric-stress plasticity, the corresponding experimental or theoretical measurements become relevant to a scaled rather than the actual yield surface. Those two surfaces resemble each other closely, but, in agreement with existing experimental evidence, their normal directions are generally different. Experimental verification of this kind of polar plastic behaviour may accordingly become possible by measuring simultaneously the values of shear-stress components acting along as well as across fibres throughout the loading process of a relevant fibrous composite specimen.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Bimodal plasticity</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Fibre-reinforced materials</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Matrix-dominated mode</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Non-symmetric plasticity</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Plastic flow</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Polar material plasticity</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Yield surfaces</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Engineering Mathematics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">95/1(2015-12-01), 31-57</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0022-0833</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">95:1&lt;31</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">95</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10665</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-014-9721-6</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-014-9721-6</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Soldatos</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kostas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Mathematical Sciences and Spencer Institute of Theoretical and Computational Mechanics, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, Nottingham, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Engineering Mathematics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">95/1(2015-12-01), 31-57</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0022-0833</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">95:1&lt;31</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">95</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10665</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
