<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606193456</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100909.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150701xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10682-015-9760-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10682-015-9760-0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Genotypic differences in phosphorus use physiology in producers ( Chlamydomonas reinhardtii ) and consumers ( Daphnia pulex ) interact to alter primary and secondary production</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Patrick Lind, Punidan Jeyasingh]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">By considering the relative abundance of elements in trophic interactions, ecological stoichiometry makes predictions about key ecological processes such as biomass production and consumer-driven nutrient recycling. Theoretical and empirical work has focused on interspecific variation in elemental composition, and stoichiometric imbalances between resources and consumers in determining productivity, particularly at the base of foodwebs. Recent work has found considerable intraspecific variation in elemental composition. We know little about the ecological relevance of such variation, and whether predictions of stoichiometric theory hold at the intraspecific level. Here, we used two genotypes of a primary producer Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, and two genotypes of a primary consumer Daphnia pulex, which are already known to vary considerably in their phosphorus (P) use physiology, under conditions of P abundance and limitation, to explore whether such intraspecific differences alter primary as well as secondary production. Specifically, we tested whether there are intraspecific differences in the carbon: phosphorus (C:P) stoichiometry of Chlamydomonas genotypes, whether such differences affect growth and abundance of the two Daphnia genotypes, and whether the two Daphnia genotypes had distinct effects on primary production and growth of the two Chlamydomonas genotypes. We found significant differences in C:P stoichiometry between the two Chlamydomonas genotypes in both P supply conditions. Such intraspecific differences altered the growth of Daphnia genotypes, and affected the outcome of genotypic competition. Finally, Daphnia genotype affected primary production, and interacted with P supply to distinctly affect the growth of the two Chlamydomonas genotypes. Together, our results highlight the potential ecological relevance of intraspecific differences in nutrient use physiology and elemental composition, and the utility of ecological stoichiometry in understanding such consequences.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Consumer-driven nutrient cycling</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Ecological stoichiometry</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Eco-evolutionary dynamics</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Genetic variation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Genotype by environment interactions</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Psr1</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Lind</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Patrick</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, 501 Life Sciences West, 74078, Stillwater, OK, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Jeyasingh</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Punidan</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, 501 Life Sciences West, 74078, Stillwater, OK, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Evolutionary Ecology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer International Publishing</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">29/4(2015-07-01), 551-563</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0269-7653</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">29:4&lt;551</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">29</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10682</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-015-9760-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-015-9760-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Lind</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Patrick</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, 501 Life Sciences West, 74078, Stillwater, OK, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Jeyasingh</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Punidan</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, 501 Life Sciences West, 74078, Stillwater, OK, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Evolutionary Ecology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer International Publishing</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">29/4(2015-07-01), 551-563</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0269-7653</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">29:4&lt;551</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">29</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10682</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
