<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">60619634X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100923.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10260-014-0287-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10260-014-0287-2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Exploring copulas for the imputation of complex dependent data</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[F. DiLascio, Simone Giannerini, Alessandra Reale]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In this work we introduce a copula-based method for imputing missing data by using conditional density functions of the missing variables given the observed ones. In theory, such functions can be derived from the multivariate distribution of the variables of interest. In practice, it is very difficult to model joint distributions and derive conditional distributions, especially when the margins are different. We propose a natural solution to the problem by exploiting copulas so that we derive conditional density functions through the corresponding conditional copulas. The approach is appealing since copula functions enable us (1) to fit any combination of marginal distribution functions, (2) to take into account complex multivariate dependence relationships and (3) to model the marginal distributions and the dependence structure separately. We describe the method and perform a Monte Carlo study in order to compare it with two well-known imputation techniques: the nearest neighbour donor imputation and the regression imputation by EM algorithm. Our results indicate that the proposal compares favourably with classical methods in terms of preservation of microdata, margins and dependence structure.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Imputation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Copula function</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Multivariate dependence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Donor imputation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">EM-based regression imputation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">DiLascio</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">F.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Faculty of Economics and Management, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Giannerini</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Simone</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Reale</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Alessandra</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">ISTAT, Italian Statistical Institute, Rome, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Statistical Methods &amp; Applications</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">24/1(2015-03-01), 159-175</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1618-2510</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">24:1&lt;159</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">24</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10260</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-014-0287-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-014-0287-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">DiLascio</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">F.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Faculty of Economics and Management, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Giannerini</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Simone</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Reale</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Alessandra</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">ISTAT, Italian Statistical Institute, Rome, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Statistical Methods &amp; Applications</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">24/1(2015-03-01), 159-175</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1618-2510</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">24:1&lt;159</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">24</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10260</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
