<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606197303</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100928.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00348-015-2004-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00348-015-2004-9</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Particle imaging through planar shock waves and associated velocimetry errors</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[G. Elsinga, G. Orlicz]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">When imaging particles through a shock wave, the resulting particle image appears blurred and at the wrong location, which is referred to as a position error. Particle image doublets are observed if only part of the light scattered by a particle is deflected or reflected by the shock. These optical distortions are due to the jump in the refractive index that occurs over the shock. Within the context of popular particle-based velocimetry techniques, such as particle image velocimetry and particle tracking velocimetry, the position error propagates into an error in the measured velocity. These particle image distortions and associated errors are assessed and quantified in this paper for the case of planar shocks by means of a light ray tracing approach and by experiments. The errors are shown to be most sensitive to the angle between the viewing direction and the plane of the shock. Increasing this angle to modest values (~5°) is a particularly effective way to decrease the relative velocity error. Looking at the shock from the high-density side is recommended when the accurate determination of the particle response to the shock wave is desired.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The Author(s), 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Elsinga</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">G.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratory for Aero and Hydrodynamics, Department of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 21, 2628 CA, Delft, The Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Orlicz</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">G.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Physics Division, MS H803, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 87545, Los Alamos, NM, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Experiments in Fluids</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">56/6(2015-06-01), 1-12</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0723-4864</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">56:6&lt;1</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">56</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">348</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-2004-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-2004-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Elsinga</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">G.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratory for Aero and Hydrodynamics, Department of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 21, 2628 CA, Delft, The Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Orlicz</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">G.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Physics Division, MS H803, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 87545, Los Alamos, NM, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Experiments in Fluids</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">56/6(2015-06-01), 1-12</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0723-4864</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">56:6&lt;1</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">56</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">348</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
