<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606204288</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128101001.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10388-014-0451-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10388-014-0451-7</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Optimal duration of prophylactic antimicrobial administration and risk of postoperative infectious events in thoracic esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection: short-course versus prolonged antimicrobial administration</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Takeo Fujita, Hiroyuki Daiko]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Background: For prevention of surgical site infections, the current guidelines of Center of Disease Control recommend the maintenance of therapeutic levels of prophylactic antimicrobial agents throughout operations and, at most, for a few hours after incision closure. However, in literature supporting these recommendations, most reports have described combinations of various types of surgical procedures. Consequently, the optimal duration of prophylactic antimicrobial administration in esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection has not been fully addressed. Methods: We randomly assigned 257 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection into two groups and analyzed the incidences of surgical site and remote infections. Antimicrobial administration began 30min before the skin incision was made and repeated every 3h during the procedure in the short-course administration group, whereas additional administration was postoperatively continued the day after operation in the prolonged administration group. Results: Among the 128/129 patients in the short-course/prolonged administration group, surgical site infections occurred in 26.5%/24.0% (p=0.64), anastomotic leakage in 11.7%/15.5% (p=0.37), and incisional surgical site infections in 14.8%/8.5% patients, respectively (p=0.11). Remote infections occurred in 11.7%/11.6% (p=0.86) patients, respectively, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 14days (p=0.86) in both groups. Conclusions: In esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection, short-course antimicrobial administration was sufficient for the prevention of postoperative infectious events.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The Japan Esophageal Society and Springer Japan, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Esophageal cancer</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Esophagectomy</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Surgical site infection</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Prophylactic antimicrobial agent</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Fujita</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Takeo</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-0882, Chiba, Japan</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Daiko</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hiroyuki</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-0882, Chiba, Japan</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Esophagus</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Japan</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">12/1(2015-01-01), 38-43</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1612-9059</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">12:1&lt;38</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">12</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10388</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-014-0451-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-014-0451-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Fujita</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Takeo</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-0882, Chiba, Japan</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Daiko</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hiroyuki</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-0882, Chiba, Japan</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Esophagus</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Japan</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">12/1(2015-01-01), 38-43</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1612-9059</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">12:1&lt;38</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">12</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10388</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
