<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606210997</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128101036.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150901xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10926-014-9561-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10926-014-9561-2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Labour Market Status and Well-Being in the Context of Return to Work After Vocational Rehabilitation in Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Nancy Reims, Ulrike Bauer]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Introduction Although there is much empirical evidence for a given relationship between health and labour market status (LMS), the following study focuses on a group for which little is known in the German context: people with disabilities in vocational rehabilitation for the purpose of re-integration into the labour market. In this specific context, the article analyses how a change in LMS affects physical, mental and general health. Methods Using a panel survey, 857 people with disabilities in vocational rehabilitation and their subjective health condition were observed between 2008 and 2010. To reduce bias due to unobserved heterogeneity, fixed-effects panel regression is applied. Results Results show that a move from non-employment to employment positively affects—particularly general—subjective health. In addition to LMS, the level of occupational limitation due to disability appears to be of particular relevance in estimating health. Interacting both the level of occupational limitation and LMS reveals that non-employed people reporting serious occupational limitation due to their disability have the worst subjective health across all aspects. However, people in employment experiencing similarly serious limitations due to their disability do not differ much from this group. These may be regarded as having taken up disability-inappropriate employment. Conclusion The results suggest that re-integration into employment particularly improves several health aspects if rehabilitants are integrated in an occupational environment where disability does not present an occupational limitation. Thus, placement in disability-appropriate employment needs to be particularly encouraged.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Vocational rehabilitation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">People with disabilities</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Occupational health</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Social participation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Return to work</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Reims</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Nancy</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute for Employment Research, Regensburger Straße 104, 90478, Nuremberg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Bauer</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ulrike</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute for Employment Research, Regensburger Straße 104, 90478, Nuremberg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">25/3(2015-09-01), 543-556</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1053-0487</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">25:3&lt;543</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">25</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10926</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9561-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9561-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Reims</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Nancy</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute for Employment Research, Regensburger Straße 104, 90478, Nuremberg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Bauer</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ulrike</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute for Employment Research, Regensburger Straße 104, 90478, Nuremberg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">25/3(2015-09-01), 543-556</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1053-0487</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">25:3&lt;543</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">25</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10926</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
