<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606217762</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128101109.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150701xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11104-015-2465-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11104-015-2465-x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">On the controls of root lifespan: assessing the role of soluble phenolics</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Thomas Adams, David Eissenstat]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Aims: In addition to multiple above- and belowground abiotic factors, root herbivory can be an important determinant of root lifespan. In this study, we investigated the relationship between fine-root soluble phenolic content, a putative measure of chemical defense against herbivory, and explicit factors that have previously been related to fine-root lifespan. We hypothesized that fine-root soluble phenolic content would be positively related to factors previously shownto be correlated with increased root lifespan. Methods: In a common garden, utilizing nine temperate trees species, we examined the relationship between fine-root soluble phenolic content and fine-root branching order, diameter, rooting depth, localized nitrogen availability, and tree growth rate. Results: Consistent with our hypothesis, fine-root soluble phenolic content significantly increased with increasing branching order (P &lt; 0.001). However, phenolic content significantly decreased with increasing localized N enrichment (P = 0.002), despite previous work indicating increased lifespan in N-enriched patches. We found no other significant relationships between fine-root soluble phenolic content and any of the other factors investigated. Conclusions: While this study provides detailed information about sources of variation in soluble phenolic content in roots, we were unable to find general utility in using a Folin-Denis based soluble-phenolic assay to increase our understanding of the factors associated with fine-root lifespan.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Root lifespan</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Soluble phenolics</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Herbivory</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Chemical defense</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Adams</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Thomas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Ecosystem Science and Management and the Ecology Graduate Program, the Pennsylvania State University, 201 Forest Resources Building, 16802, University Park, PA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Eissenstat</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Ecosystem Science and Management and the Ecology Graduate Program, the Pennsylvania State University, 201 Forest Resources Building, 16802, University Park, PA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Plant and Soil</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer International Publishing</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">392/1-2(2015-07-01), 301-308</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0032-079X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">392:1-2&lt;301</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">392</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11104</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2465-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2465-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Adams</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Thomas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Ecosystem Science and Management and the Ecology Graduate Program, the Pennsylvania State University, 201 Forest Resources Building, 16802, University Park, PA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Eissenstat</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Ecosystem Science and Management and the Ecology Graduate Program, the Pennsylvania State University, 201 Forest Resources Building, 16802, University Park, PA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Plant and Soil</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer International Publishing</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">392/1-2(2015-07-01), 301-308</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0032-079X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">392:1-2&lt;301</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">392</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11104</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
