<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">60621903X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128101116.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11104-015-2419-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11104-015-2419-3</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Should I stay or should I go? Roots segregate in response to competition intensity</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Christoph Schmid, Sibylle Bauer, Maik Bartelheimer]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Background and Aims: Root segregation has been observed in a variety of species. Though it is usually attributed to a plant's attempt to avoid below ground competition, a direct correlation of root distribution with the intensity of competition has never been shown. Methods: The test species Hieracium pilosella L. was exposed to a gradient of competitive pressure using the closely related species Arabidopsis petraea (L.) V.I.DOROF., Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh ., Capsella rubella Reut . and Cardamine hirsuta L. as neighbouring plants. Horizontal root distribution was quantified using a soil monolith method. Results: The neighbour species could be ranked according to their competitive effect on the test species, identifying two weak (A. thaliana and A. petraea) and two strong competitors (C. hirsuta and C. rubella). The degree of root segregation correlated negatively with the competitive effect caused by the various neighbour species. Conclusions: We conclude that root segregation is indeed a response to competitive pressure. Further factors such as root symbiotic relationships or root exuded allelochemicals are supposedly involved in the outcome of root interactions. We propose the use of screening experiments on root responses to various neighbours in order to quantify each factor's relative influence on rooting patterns.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Root segregation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Root distribution</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Below ground competition</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Hieracium pilosella</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Monolith method</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Information integration</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Schmid</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Christoph</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Preclinical Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Bauer</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Sibylle</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Preclinical Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Bartelheimer</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Maik</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Preclinical Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Plant and Soil</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer International Publishing</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">391/1-2(2015-06-01), 283-291</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0032-079X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">391:1-2&lt;283</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">391</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11104</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2419-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2419-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Schmid</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Christoph</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Preclinical Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Bauer</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Sibylle</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Preclinical Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Bartelheimer</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Maik</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Preclinical Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Plant and Soil</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer International Publishing</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">391/1-2(2015-06-01), 283-291</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0032-079X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">391:1-2&lt;283</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">391</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11104</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
