<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606222154</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128101132.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00038-014-0634-y</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00038-014-0634-y</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Examining the significance of urban-rural context in tobacco quitline use: does rurality matter?</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Edward Griffin, Graham Moon, Ross Barnet]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the importance of urban-rural context as a determinant of call rates to smoking cessation lines. Methods: This study used individual level New Zealand Quitline call data from 2005 to 2009, and 2006 New Zealand Census data on smoking to calculate Quitline call rates for smokers. Negative binomial regression examined the relationship between call rates and a sevenfold urban-rural classification, controlling for age, sex, ethnicity and deprivation. Results: We found a significant urban-rural gradient in the rate of smokers calling Quitline. Rates were highest among smokers in main-urban areas [0.09 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.089, 0.091)] decreasing with successive urban-rural classifications to the lowest rate in rural/remote areas [0.036 (95% CI=0.03, 0.04)]. This association was not confounded by age, sex, ethnicity or deprivation. Conclusions: Smokers in rural areas are less likely to use the New Zealand Quitline, even after controlling for confounding factors. This suggests that the national quitline is less effective in reaching rural smokers and more attention to the promotion of smoking cessation in rural communities is needed.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Swiss School of Public Health, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Quitline</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Smoking cessation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Urban-rural</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Geographical information systems</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Griffin</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Edward</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Moon</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Graham</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Barnet</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ross</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">GeoHealth Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Canterbury, Canterbury, New Zealand</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Public Health</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Basel</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">60/3(2015-03-01), 327-333</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1661-8556</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">60:3&lt;327</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">60</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">38</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0634-y</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0634-y</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Griffin</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Edward</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Moon</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Graham</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Barnet</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ross</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">GeoHealth Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Canterbury, Canterbury, New Zealand</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Public Health</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Basel</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">60/3(2015-03-01), 327-333</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1661-8556</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">60:3&lt;327</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">60</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">38</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
