<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606226737</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128101154.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10641-014-0235-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10641-014-0235-x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Effects of turbidity and habitat complexity on antipredator behavior of three-spined sticklebacks ( Gasterosteus aculeatus )</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Antipredator behavior in sticklebacks</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[M. Ajemian, S. Sohel, J. Mattila]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Human-induced processes like eutrophication are increasing water turbidity and altering vegetated habitats in the Baltic Sea. Unfortunately, the influence of these environmental changes on predator-prey interactions remains poorly studied in mobile taxa of this region. We used three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) as a model species to study the combined effects of turbidity and shoot density on habitat choice (shelter vs. open) in the presence and absence of piscivorous perch (Perca fluviatilis). Habitat choice of sticklebacks was video-monitored and compared between two paired observation periods: &quot;control” (no predator) and &quot;risk” (predator present). Though sticklebacks exhibited a general preference for sheltered habitat across treatments, repeated measures ANOVA found that sticklebacks responded to predator presence by significantly increasing use of the sheltered habitat. However, shoot density of the shelter interacted with observation period, where risk-induced shifts of sticklebacks into sheltered habitat were most apparent and sustained at higher shoot densities. Stickleback activity level was generally reduced with predator presence at higher turbidity and shoot density levels, suggesting a possible adaptation to reduce predator encounter rates in visually deteriorated conditions. Overall, our study demonstrates that relatively minute increases (1's - 10's of NTU) in algal turbidity intensify three-spined stickleback sheltered habitat use, but vegetation density may still play a larger role in avoiding predators at these turbidity levels. When compared with a similar study on 0+ perch, our work suggests that eutrophication (i.e., increased turbidity, loss of habitat complexity) may have variable, taxon- and/or habitat-specific effects on predator-prey interactions of the Baltic Sea.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Antipredator behavior</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Baltic Sea</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Seagrass</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Three-spined stickleback</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Turbidity</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ajemian</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Marine Sciences, University of South Alabama, 36688, Mobile, AL, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Sohel</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Husö Biological Station, Åbo Akademi University, Artillerigatan 6, 20520, Åbo, Finland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Mattila</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Husö Biological Station, Åbo Akademi University, Artillerigatan 6, 20520, Åbo, Finland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Environmental Biology of Fishes</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">98/1(2015-01-01), 45-55</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0378-1909</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">98:1&lt;45</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">98</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10641</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-014-0235-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-014-0235-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Ajemian</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Marine Sciences, University of South Alabama, 36688, Mobile, AL, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Sohel</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Husö Biological Station, Åbo Akademi University, Artillerigatan 6, 20520, Åbo, Finland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Mattila</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Husö Biological Station, Åbo Akademi University, Artillerigatan 6, 20520, Åbo, Finland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Environmental Biology of Fishes</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">98/1(2015-01-01), 45-55</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0378-1909</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">98:1&lt;45</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">98</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10641</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
