<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606228268</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128101202.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10641-014-0306-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10641-014-0306-z</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Morphology predicting ecology: incorporating new methodological and analytical approaches</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Nathan Franssen, Christopher Goodchild, Donald Shepard]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Associations between the morphology of animals and their ecology have contributed to our understanding of phenotypic diversity by helping to relate form and function. Most early studies on fishes used traditional measurements of linear distances on the body or fins to quantify morphological variation among taxa. More recently, geometric morphometric analyses have gained popularity for assessing phenotypic shape variation. Along with new methodologies for quantifying morphological variation, researchers have become increasingly aware of the influence of phylogeny on morphological and ecological traits. Our study, which spanned seven cyprinid genera, assessed the abilities of traditional and geometric morphometric approaches to characterize ecologically relevant morphological variation. Furthermore, we compared morphometric approaches employing two analyses (partial Mantel test and Phylogenetic Canonical Correlation Analysis (PCCA)) that test for correlations among data sets while explicitly accounting for phylogenetic relationships. Traditional morphology and body shape showed similar correlations with habitat use in all analyses. In contrast, only traditional morphology was correlated with diet; however, this was only revealed by the PCCA. Our findings indicated the taxonomic span of species under study and the statistical treatment of data are important factors to consider when choosing between traditional or geometric morphometric approaches. In addition, a better understanding of phylogenetic relationships will improve our ability to establish associations between morphology and ecology.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Cyprinidae</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Ecomorphology</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Geometric morphometrics</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Phylogenetic canonical correlation analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">phytools</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Franssen</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Nathan</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, 73019, Norman, OK, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Goodchild</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Christopher</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, 73019, Norman, OK, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Shepard</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Donald</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biology, University of Central Arkansas, 72035, Conway, AR, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Environmental Biology of Fishes</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">98/2(2015-02-01), 713-724</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0378-1909</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">98:2&lt;713</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">98</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10641</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-014-0306-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-014-0306-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Franssen</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Nathan</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, 73019, Norman, OK, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Goodchild</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Christopher</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, 73019, Norman, OK, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Shepard</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Donald</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biology, University of Central Arkansas, 72035, Conway, AR, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Environmental Biology of Fishes</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">98/2(2015-02-01), 713-724</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0378-1909</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">98:2&lt;713</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">98</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10641</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
