<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606232974</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128101229.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150701xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10287-014-0227-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10287-014-0227-5</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Constructing optimal sparse portfolios using regularization methods</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[B. Fastrich, S. Paterlini, P. Winker]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Mean-variance portfolios have been criticized because of unsatisfying out-of-sample performance and the presence of extreme and unstable asset weights, especially when the number of securities is large. The bad performance is caused by estimation errors in inputs parameters, that is the covariance matrix and the expected return vector. Recent studies show that imposing a penalty on the 1-norm of the asset weights vector (i.e. $$\ell _{1}$$ ℓ 1 -regularization) not only regularizes the problem, thereby improving the out-of-sample performance, but also allows to automatically select a subset of assets to invest in. However, $$\ell _{1}$$ ℓ 1 -regularization might lead to the construction of biased solutions. We propose a new, simple type of penalty that explicitly considers financial information and then we consider several alternative penalties, that allow to improve on the $$\ell _{1}$$ ℓ 1 -regularization approach. By using U.S.-stock market data, we show empirically that the proposed penalties can lead to the construction of portfolios with an out-of-sample performance superior to several state-of-art benchmarks, especially in high dimensional problems.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Minimum variance portfolio</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Statistical regularization</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Lasso</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Non-convex penalties</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Fastrich</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">B.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Economics, University of Giessen, Licher Strasse 64, 35394, Giessen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Paterlini</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Finance and Accounting, European Business School, Gustav-Stresemann-Ring 3, 65189, Wiesbaden, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Winker</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">P.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Economics, University of Giessen, Licher Strasse 64, 35394, Giessen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Computational Management Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">12/3(2015-07-01), 417-434</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1619-697X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">12:3&lt;417</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">12</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10287</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-014-0227-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-014-0227-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Fastrich</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">B.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Economics, University of Giessen, Licher Strasse 64, 35394, Giessen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Paterlini</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Finance and Accounting, European Business School, Gustav-Stresemann-Ring 3, 65189, Wiesbaden, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Winker</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">P.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Economics, University of Giessen, Licher Strasse 64, 35394, Giessen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Computational Management Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">12/3(2015-07-01), 417-434</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1619-697X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">12:3&lt;417</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">12</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10287</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
