caa a22 4500 606241477 CHVBK 20210128101313.0 cr unu---uuuuu 210128e20150301xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s11211-014-0227-1 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11211-014-0227-1 Opposing Paths to Ideology: Group-Based Relative Deprivation Predicts Conservatism Through Warmth Toward Ingroup and Outgroup Members [Elektronische Daten] [Danny Osborne, Chris Sibley] Group-based relative deprivation (GRD) is a critical predictor of support for social change. Because resistance to change and acceptance of inequality are core features of a conservative ideology, we predicted that GRD would negatively correlate with conservatism. Moreover, given the central role affect plays in bridging the association between experiences with inequality and group-based responses, we expected that this hypothesized relationship would be mediated by intergroup emotions. We tested these hypotheses in a large national sample of Māori (N=685)—the indigenous peoples of New Zealand. As predicted, GRD was indirectly associated with conservatism through participants' warmth toward the majority outgroup (i.e., New Zealand Europeans) and the minority ingroup (i.e., Māori): whereas GRD was negatively correlated with warmth toward outgroup members, GRD was positively correlated with warmth toward the ingroup. In turn, warmth toward the (a) outgroup and (b) ingroup was positively and negatively associated with conservatism, respectively. Similar results were obtained when replacing conservatism with participants' (a) satisfaction with the government and (b) support for New Zealand's main center-right political party. Our findings demonstrate the complex relationship between GRD and political beliefs, while also highlighting the crucial role of emotions in connecting GRD with group-based attitudes. Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014 Relative deprivation nationallicence Conservatism nationallicence Affect nationallicence Ingroup nationallicence Outgroup nationallicence Ideology nationallicence Intergroup emotions nationallicence Osborne Danny School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand aut Sibley Chris School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand aut Social Justice Research Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com 28/1(2015-03-01), 27-51 0885-7466 28:1<27 2015 28 11211 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0227-1 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0227-1 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Osborne Danny School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Sibley Chris School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Social Justice Research Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com 28/1(2015-03-01), 27-51 0885-7466 28:1<27 2015 28 11211