<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">606244239</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128101329.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s12596-015-0247-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s12596-015-0247-8</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Lidar signal denoising methods- application to NARL Rayleigh lidar</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[M. Sarvani, K. Raghunath, S. Rao]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Lidar (Light Detection And Ranging) is a remote sensing tool of great practical importance in environmental monitoring sciences. As an active remote sensing instrument, lidar provides vertical profiles of aerosol layers and atmospheric temperatures. The effective range and data reliability of lidar is often limited by various noises. Signal processing for lidar applications involves highly nonlinear models and consequently nonlinear filtering as the backscattered signal follows log-linear form. Denoising of the signal is essential for reducing random unwanted variations of the signal, in order to get the significance of the signal as much as possible. In this work, various denoising methods are applied to the signal from Rayleigh receiver of lidar at National Atmospheric Research Laboratory (NARL), Gadanki (13.8°N, 79.2°E) near Tirupati, India. Denoising methods such as Moving Average method, Wavelet and Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) method are considered and compared in this work. The Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), temperature profiles and statistical standard temperature errors are obtained using denoised signals. It is found that EMD gives better SNRs than other denoising methods. The statistical standard temperature error obtained using EMD denoised signal and the original signal are compared and the EMD method is found to reduce temperature errors at higher ranges better than conventional method.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The Optical Society of India, 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Lidar</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Denoising methods</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Signal to noise ratio</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Atmospheric temperature retrieval</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Temperature error</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Sarvani</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Physics, SV University, 517 502, Tirupati, India</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Raghunath</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">National Atmospheric Research Laboratory, 517 112, Gadanki, India</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Rao</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Physics, SV University, 517 502, Tirupati, India</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Optics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer India</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">44/2(2015-06-01), 164-171</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0972-8821</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">44:2&lt;164</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">44</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">12596</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-015-0247-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-015-0247-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Sarvani</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Physics, SV University, 517 502, Tirupati, India</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Raghunath</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">National Atmospheric Research Laboratory, 517 112, Gadanki, India</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Rao</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Physics, SV University, 517 502, Tirupati, India</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Optics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer India</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">44/2(2015-06-01), 164-171</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0972-8821</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">44:2&lt;164</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">44</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">12596</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
