caa a22 4500 606247513 CHVBK 20210128101345.0 cr unu---uuuuu 210128e20151201xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s12262-013-0906-4 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s12262-013-0906-4 Randomised Controlled Trial of Day-Case Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs Routine Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [Elektronische Daten] [Sanjay Kumar, Shadan Ali, Shabi Ahmad, Kusum Meena, H. Chandola] Many randomised controlled trials conducted worldwide favours for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but questions have been raised regarding its application in developing country like ours. Hence, considering it a high time to review current practices, we conducted this trial to report our experience with day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to access its feasibility and safety in our set-up. Data from 65 patients with symptomatic gallstone were randomised to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy either as day-case procedure or as routine (conventional) procedure. Complication, quality of life, satisfaction, post-operative nausea and vomiting and pain were assessed. Ninety-seven per cent (31/32) of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients were successfully discharged with mean duration of 8.9 ± 4.54h, which was 3.33 ± 1.45days (72.92 ± 34.8h) in routine (conventional) laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. There was no significant difference in complication, quality of life, satisfaction, post-operative nausea and vomiting and pain between the two groups. Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe, feasible and beneficial procedure in our set-up. Patient acceptance in terms of quality of life and satisfaction was similar to that of routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Association of Surgeons of India, 2013 Day case nationallicence Gallbladder nationallicence Laparoscopic cholecystectomy nationallicence Post operative nausea and vomiting nationallicence Kumar Sanjay Department of Surgery, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Smt. Sucheta Kriplani Hospital, New Delhi, India aut Ali Shadan Department of Surgery, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Smt. Sucheta Kriplani Hospital, New Delhi, India aut Ahmad Shabi Department of Surgery, M.L.N. Medical College, Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital, Allahabad, India aut Meena Kusum Department of Surgery, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Smt. Sucheta Kriplani Hospital, New Delhi, India aut Chandola H. Department of Anaesthesia, M.L.N. Medical College, Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital, Allahabad, India aut Indian Journal of Surgery Springer India 77(2015-12-01), 520-524 0972-2068 77<520 2015 77 12262 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-013-0906-4 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-013-0906-4 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Kumar Sanjay Department of Surgery, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Smt. Sucheta Kriplani Hospital, New Delhi, India aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Ali Shadan Department of Surgery, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Smt. Sucheta Kriplani Hospital, New Delhi, India aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Ahmad Shabi Department of Surgery, M.L.N. Medical College, Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital, Allahabad, India aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Meena Kusum Department of Surgery, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Smt. Sucheta Kriplani Hospital, New Delhi, India aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Chandola H. Department of Anaesthesia, M.L.N. Medical College, Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital, Allahabad, India aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Indian Journal of Surgery Springer India 77(2015-12-01), 520-524 0972-2068 77<520 2015 77 12262