China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378870025 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123407.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20031227xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.2202/1535-1653.1104 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1535-1653.1104 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Killion |D M. Ulric |u 1Guangdong University of Foreign Studies and Trade, mauricekillion@netscape.net | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [M. Ulric Killion] |
| 520 | 3 | |a This article discusses the probability of growth of neo-liberalism in modern China and its implications for Chinese constitutionalism. A China polity under the vision of a neo-liberal regime engenders problems of prescribing a legal system and identifying constitutional ethos. The genesis of this article is a February 21, 2003, symposium of Chinese neo-liberals, who proffer Chinese neo-liberalism in answer to issues of reforms and Chinese constitutionalism. A Chinese neo-liberal constitutional coterie desiderates immediate democracy and a governmental model that mirrors a United States constitutional government, replete with separation of powers and independent judicial review. Such urgings are arguably a denial of both the historicity of Western liberalism and Chinas ontological base in tradition, being Confucianism. The historic excesses and abuses of liberalism should serve to frustrate a transplant of neo-liberal constitutionalism in China. | |
| 540 | |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a constitutionalism |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a neo-liberalism |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a liberalism |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a China |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a China |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a constitutionalism |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a neo-liberalism |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a liberalism |2 nationallicence | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Global Jurist Frontiers |d De Gruyter |g 3/2(2003-12-27) |q 3:2 |1 2003 |2 3 |o gj | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1535-1653.1104 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1535-1653.1104 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Killion |D M. Ulric |u 1Guangdong University of Foreign Studies and Trade, mauricekillion@netscape.net | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Global Jurist Frontiers |d De Gruyter |g 3/2(2003-12-27) |q 3:2 |1 2003 |2 3 |o gj | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||