"Groups" and the Advent of Critical Race Scholarship
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378872435 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123412.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20030529xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.2202/1539-8323.1038 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1539-8323.1038 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Abrams |D Kathryn |u 1Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley, krabrams@law.berkeley.edu | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a "Groups" and the Advent of Critical Race Scholarship |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Kathryn Abrams] |
| 520 | 3 | |a Some scholarly commentators have described Owen Fiss's landmark article "Groups and the Equal Protection Clause" as having helped to produce the intellectual framework that has distinguished Critical Race Theory. This essay finds the issue to be more complex, and the critical thrust of Fiss's article more ambivalent. Fiss's approach boldly foresakes the jurisprudential comforts of neutrality, individualism and means/ends analysis for an explicit focuson the material and dignitary circumstances of African-Americans. Yet its account of racial disadvantage is surprisingly de-contextualized: it reflects neither the contemporaneous perspectives of its African-American subjects, nor more than a fleeting sense of the agonistic political dynamics that produced it. This reified rendering yields an account of Black disadvantage that is decoupled from a corresponding account of white supremacy. This essay explores this critical ambivalence and reflects upon its causes. It also considers the implications of Fiss's ambivalence for the Court's increasingly firm embrace of one "mediating principle" in the area of equal protection. | |
| 540 | |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a The Origins and Fate of Antisubordination Theory |2 nationallicence | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Issues in Legal Scholarship |d De Gruyter |g 2/1(2003-05-29) |q 2:1 |1 2003 |2 2 |o ils | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1038 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1038 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Abrams |D Kathryn |u 1Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley, krabrams@law.berkeley.edu | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Issues in Legal Scholarship |d De Gruyter |g 2/1(2003-05-29) |q 2:1 |1 2003 |2 2 |o ils | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||