Beyond Student Ratings: Peer Observation of Classroom and Clinical Teaching

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Ronald A Berk, Phyllis L Naumann, Susan E Appling]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2004
Enthalten in:
International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 1/1(2004-07-04)
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 378930230
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 378930230
003 CHVBK
005 20180305123627.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 161128e20040704xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.2202/1548-923X.1024  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1548-923X.1024 
245 0 0 |a Beyond Student Ratings: Peer Observation of Classroom and Clinical Teaching  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Ronald A Berk, Phyllis L Naumann, Susan E Appling] 
520 3 |a Peer observation of classroom and clinical teaching has received increased attention over the past decade in schools of nursing to augment student ratings of teaching effectiveness. One essential ingredient is the scale used to evaluate performance. A five-step systematic procedure for adapting, writing, and building any peer observation scale is described. The differences between the development of a classroom observation scale and an appraisal scale to observe clinical instructors are examined. Psychometric issues peculiar to observation scales are discussed in terms of content validity, eight types of response bias, and interobserver reliability. The applications of the scales in one school of nursing as part of the triangulation of methods with student ratings and the teaching portfolio are illustrated. Copies of the scales are also provided. 
540 |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston 
690 7 |a peer review  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a peer observation  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a faculty evaluation  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a clinical teaching  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a student ratings  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Berk  |D Ronald A.  |u Johns Hopkins University, rberk@son.jhmi.edu  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Naumann  |D Phyllis L.  |u Johns Hopkins University, pnaumann@son.jhmi.edu  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Appling  |D Susan E.  |u Johns Hopkins University, sappling@son.jhmi.edu  |4 aut 
773 0 |t International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship  |d De Gruyter  |g 1/1(2004-07-04)  |q 1:1  |1 2004  |2 1  |o ijnes 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1024  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
908 |D 1  |a research article  |2 jats 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1024  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Berk  |D Ronald A.  |u Johns Hopkins University, rberk@son.jhmi.edu  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Naumann  |D Phyllis L.  |u Johns Hopkins University, pnaumann@son.jhmi.edu  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Appling  |D Susan E.  |u Johns Hopkins University, sappling@son.jhmi.edu  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship  |d De Gruyter  |g 1/1(2004-07-04)  |q 1:1  |1 2004  |2 1  |o ijnes 
900 7 |b CC0  |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0  |2 nationallicence 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-gruyter