Empathy and morality in behaviour readers

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Susana Monsó]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Biology & Philosophy, 30/5(2015-09-01), 671-690
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605448426
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605448426
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100136.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150901xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10539-015-9495-x  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10539-015-9495-x 
100 1 |a Monsó  |D Susana  |u Department of Logic, History and Philosophy of Science, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Empathy and morality in behaviour readers  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Susana Monsó] 
520 3 |a It is tempting to assume that being a moral creature requires the capacity to attribute mental states to others, because a creature cannot be moral unless she is capable of comprehending how her actions can have an impact on the well-being of those around her. If this assumption were true, then mere behaviour readers could never qualify as moral, for they are incapable of conceptualising mental states and attributing them to others. In this paper, I argue against such an assumption by discussing the specific case of empathy. I present a characterisation of empathy that would not require an ability to attribute mental states to others, but would nevertheless allow the creature who possessed it to qualify as a moral being. Provided certain conditions are met, a behaviour reader could be motivated to act by this form of empathy, and this means that behaviour readers could be moral. The case for animal morality, I shall argue, is therefore independent of the case for animal mindreading. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2015 
690 7 |a Empathy  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Morality  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Moral emotions  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Nonhuman animals  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Behaviour reading  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Mindreading/theory of mind  |2 nationallicence 
773 0 |t Biology & Philosophy  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 30/5(2015-09-01), 671-690  |x 0169-3867  |q 30:5<671  |1 2015  |2 30  |o 10539 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9495-x  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9495-x  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Monsó  |D Susana  |u Department of Logic, History and Philosophy of Science, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Biology & Philosophy  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 30/5(2015-09-01), 671-690  |x 0169-3867  |q 30:5<671  |1 2015  |2 30  |o 10539