Denoting treatment outcome in child and adolescent psychiatry: a comparison of continuous and categorical outcomes
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605477507 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100401.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20150501xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s00787-014-0609-9 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00787-014-0609-9 | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Denoting treatment outcome in child and adolescent psychiatry: a comparison of continuous and categorical outcomes |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Edwin de Beurs, Marko Barendregt, Bente Rogmans, Sylvana Robbers, Marieke van Geffen, Marleen van Aggelen-Gerrits, Huub Houben] |
| 520 | 3 | |a Various approaches have been proposed to denote treatment outcome, such as the effect size of the pre-to-posttest change, percentage improvement, statistically reliable change, and clinical significant change. The aim of the study is to compare these approaches and evaluate their aptitude to differentiate among child and adolescent mental healthcare providers regarding their treatment outcome. Comparing outcomes according to continuous and categorical outcome indicators using real-life data of seven mental healthcare providers, three using the Child Behavior Checklist and four using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as primary outcome measure. Within each dataset consistent differences were found between providers and the various methods led to comparable rankings of providers. Statistical considerations designate continuous outcomes as the optimal choice. Change scores have more statistical power and allow for a ranking of providers at first glance. Expressing providers' performance in proportions of recovered, changed, unchanged, or deteriorated patients has supplementary value, as it denotes outcome in a manner more easily interpreted and appreciated by clinicians, managerial staff, and, last but not least, by patients or their parents. | |
| 540 | |a Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Treatment outcome research |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Effect size (ES) |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Reliable change index (RCI) |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Percentage improvement (PI) |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Benchmarking |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a de Beurs |D Edwin |u Stichting Benchmark GGZ, Rembrandtlaan 46, 3723 BK, Bilthoven, The Netherlands |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Barendregt |D Marko |u Stichting Benchmark GGZ, Rembrandtlaan 46, 3723 BK, Bilthoven, The Netherlands |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rogmans |D Bente |u Department of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK, Leiden, The Netherlands |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Robbers |D Sylvana |u Yulius Academy, Mathenesserlaan 202, 3014 HH, Rotterdam, The Netherlands |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van Geffen |D Marieke |u De Viersprong, De Beeklaan 2, 4661 EP, Halsteren, The Netherlands |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van Aggelen-Gerrits |D Marleen |u PIONN, Papenvoort 21, 9447 TT, Papenvoort, The Netherlands |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Houben |D Huub |u Mentaal Beter, Soestdijkerweg 17, 3734 MG, Den Dolder, The Netherlands |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg |g 24/5(2015-05-01), 553-563 |x 1018-8827 |q 24:5<553 |1 2015 |2 24 |o 787 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-014-0609-9 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-014-0609-9 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a de Beurs |D Edwin |u Stichting Benchmark GGZ, Rembrandtlaan 46, 3723 BK, Bilthoven, The Netherlands |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Barendregt |D Marko |u Stichting Benchmark GGZ, Rembrandtlaan 46, 3723 BK, Bilthoven, The Netherlands |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Rogmans |D Bente |u Department of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK, Leiden, The Netherlands |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Robbers |D Sylvana |u Yulius Academy, Mathenesserlaan 202, 3014 HH, Rotterdam, The Netherlands |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a van Geffen |D Marieke |u De Viersprong, De Beeklaan 2, 4661 EP, Halsteren, The Netherlands |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a van Aggelen-Gerrits |D Marleen |u PIONN, Papenvoort 21, 9447 TT, Papenvoort, The Netherlands |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Houben |D Huub |u Mentaal Beter, Soestdijkerweg 17, 3734 MG, Den Dolder, The Netherlands |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg |g 24/5(2015-05-01), 553-563 |x 1018-8827 |q 24:5<553 |1 2015 |2 24 |o 787 | ||