Universal Values and Virtues in Management Versus Cross-Cultural Moral Relativism: An Educational Strategy to Clear the Ground for Business Ethics

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Geert Demuijnck]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Business Ethics, 128/4(2015-06-01), 817-835
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605483221
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605483221
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100430.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150601xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10551-014-2065-3  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10551-014-2065-3 
100 1 |a Demuijnck  |D Geert  |u EDHEC Business School, 24 avenue Gustave Delory, CS 50411, 59057, Roubaix Cedex 1, France  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Universal Values and Virtues in Management Versus Cross-Cultural Moral Relativism: An Educational Strategy to Clear the Ground for Business Ethics  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Geert Demuijnck] 
520 3 |a Despite the fact that business people and business students often cast doubt on the relevance of universal moral principles in business, the rejection of relativism is a precondition for business ethics to get off the ground. This paper proposes an educational strategy to overcome the philosophical confusions about relativism in which business people and students are often trapped. First, the paper provides some conceptual distinctions and clarifications related to moral relativism, particularism, and virtue ethics. More particularly, it revisits arguments demonstrating that virtues in business are not in contradiction with the relevance of universal principles, despite the fact that virtue ethics is often identified with particular relationships and contexts. It goes on to show how students and managers, but also researchers, often mix up radically different conceptions of moral relativism. It is also argued that this confusion is in part created by the cross-cultural management literature in which the methodological stance of the value-freedom of the social sciences is, in a perplexingly mistaken way, transformed into a rejection of all normative discussion and a plea for relativism. The remainder of the paper presents some tools that may be helpful in steering people toward less simplistic views about moral relativism and virtue ethics. It further argues that it is equally important to spell out that moral universalism can be understood in a humble way, without implying either arrogant ethnocentrism or omniscience, as part of an ongoing debate that progresses gradually. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014 
690 7 |a Moral relativism  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Cross-cultural management  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Universalism  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Virtues  |2 nationallicence 
773 0 |t Journal of Business Ethics  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 128/4(2015-06-01), 817-835  |x 0167-4544  |q 128:4<817  |1 2015  |2 128  |o 10551 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2065-3  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2065-3  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Demuijnck  |D Geert  |u EDHEC Business School, 24 avenue Gustave Delory, CS 50411, 59057, Roubaix Cedex 1, France  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Business Ethics  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 128/4(2015-06-01), 817-835  |x 0167-4544  |q 128:4<817  |1 2015  |2 128  |o 10551