Genetic Counselor Perceptions of Genetic Counseling Session Goals: A Validation Study of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Julianne Hartmann, Patricia Veach, Ian MacFarlane, Bonnie LeRoy]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24/2(2015-04-01), 225-237
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605544972
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605544972
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100934.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150401xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10897-013-9647-6  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10897-013-9647-6 
245 0 0 |a Genetic Counselor Perceptions of Genetic Counseling Session Goals: A Validation Study of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Julianne Hartmann, Patricia Veach, Ian MacFarlane, Bonnie LeRoy] 
520 3 |a Although some researchers have attempted to define genetic counseling practice goals, no study has obtained consensus about the goals from a large sample of genetic counselors. The Reciprocal-Engagement Model (REM; McCarthy Veach, Bartels & LeRoy, 2007) articulates 17 goals of genetic counseling practice. The present study investigated whether these goals could be generalized as a model of practice, as determined by a larger group of clinical genetic counselors. Accordingly, 194 genetic counselors were surveyed regarding their opinions about the importance of each goal and their perceptions of how frequently they achieve each goal. Mean importance ratings suggest they viewed every goal as important. Factor analysis of the 17 goals yielded four factors: Understanding and Appreciation, Support and Guidance, Facilitative Decision-Making, and Patient-Centered Education. Patient-Centered Education and Facilitative Decision-Making goals received the highest mean importance ratings. Mean frequency ratings were consistently lower than importance ratings, suggesting genetic counseling goals may be difficult to achieve and/or not applicable in all situations. A number of respondents provided comments about the REM goals that offer insight into factors related to implementing the goals in clinical practice. This study presents preliminary evidence concerning the validity of the goals component of the REM. 
540 |a National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc., 2013 
690 7 |a Genetic counseling goals  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Reciprocal-Engagement Model  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Models of practice  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Process goals  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Outcome goals  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Genetic counseling models  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Hartmann  |D Julianne  |u University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Veach  |D Patricia  |u Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, 250 Education Sciences Building, 56 E. River Road, 55455, Minneapolis, MN, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a MacFarlane  |D Ian  |u Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a LeRoy  |D Bonnie  |u Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Journal of Genetic Counseling  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 24/2(2015-04-01), 225-237  |x 1059-7700  |q 24:2<225  |1 2015  |2 24  |o 10897 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9647-6  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9647-6  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Hartmann  |D Julianne  |u University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Veach  |D Patricia  |u Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, 250 Education Sciences Building, 56 E. River Road, 55455, Minneapolis, MN, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a MacFarlane  |D Ian  |u Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a LeRoy  |D Bonnie  |u Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Genetic Counseling  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 24/2(2015-04-01), 225-237  |x 1059-7700  |q 24:2<225  |1 2015  |2 24  |o 10897