Genetic Counselor Perceptions of Genetic Counseling Session Goals: A Validation Study of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model
Gespeichert in:
Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Julianne Hartmann, Patricia Veach, Ian MacFarlane, Bonnie LeRoy]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24/2(2015-04-01), 225-237
Format:
Artikel (online)
Online Zugang:
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605544972 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100934.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20150401xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s10897-013-9647-6 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10897-013-9647-6 | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Genetic Counselor Perceptions of Genetic Counseling Session Goals: A Validation Study of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Julianne Hartmann, Patricia Veach, Ian MacFarlane, Bonnie LeRoy] |
| 520 | 3 | |a Although some researchers have attempted to define genetic counseling practice goals, no study has obtained consensus about the goals from a large sample of genetic counselors. The Reciprocal-Engagement Model (REM; McCarthy Veach, Bartels & LeRoy, 2007) articulates 17 goals of genetic counseling practice. The present study investigated whether these goals could be generalized as a model of practice, as determined by a larger group of clinical genetic counselors. Accordingly, 194 genetic counselors were surveyed regarding their opinions about the importance of each goal and their perceptions of how frequently they achieve each goal. Mean importance ratings suggest they viewed every goal as important. Factor analysis of the 17 goals yielded four factors: Understanding and Appreciation, Support and Guidance, Facilitative Decision-Making, and Patient-Centered Education. Patient-Centered Education and Facilitative Decision-Making goals received the highest mean importance ratings. Mean frequency ratings were consistently lower than importance ratings, suggesting genetic counseling goals may be difficult to achieve and/or not applicable in all situations. A number of respondents provided comments about the REM goals that offer insight into factors related to implementing the goals in clinical practice. This study presents preliminary evidence concerning the validity of the goals component of the REM. | |
| 540 | |a National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc., 2013 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Genetic counseling goals |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Reciprocal-Engagement Model |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Models of practice |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Process goals |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Outcome goals |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Genetic counseling models |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hartmann |D Julianne |u University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Veach |D Patricia |u Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, 250 Education Sciences Building, 56 E. River Road, 55455, Minneapolis, MN, USA |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a MacFarlane |D Ian |u Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a LeRoy |D Bonnie |u Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Journal of Genetic Counseling |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com |g 24/2(2015-04-01), 225-237 |x 1059-7700 |q 24:2<225 |1 2015 |2 24 |o 10897 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9647-6 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9647-6 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Hartmann |D Julianne |u University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Veach |D Patricia |u Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, 250 Education Sciences Building, 56 E. River Road, 55455, Minneapolis, MN, USA |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a MacFarlane |D Ian |u Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a LeRoy |D Bonnie |u Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Journal of Genetic Counseling |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com |g 24/2(2015-04-01), 225-237 |x 1059-7700 |q 24:2<225 |1 2015 |2 24 |o 10897 | ||